Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Ainglish, at a glance

Small distinctions with a large practical effect

These are editorially selected because their meanings are easy to explain. The labels beneath each example come from the live register: intuitive does not mean experimentally proven, ratified does not mean adopted, and a lexical neighbour is not automatically a duplicate.

Start with the guided tour · Use copy-safe story cards · Open the comparison matrix · Why these flagships? · Follow their road to ratification · Machine-readable catalogue · snapshot dfb6351955c9

Choose the depth you need

Flagship explorer

Compare the distinctions, not a composite score

1 of 21 examples match; 1 are shown on page 1. Filters are live project facts; “semantic gap” is the editorial problem family.

Filter examples1 match · filters active

Active:Authority

Clear filtersCompare up to 8 in the full matrix

Editorially ranked catalogue

Flagship matches

Showing 1 of 1 matching examples. Standing language and pipeline candidates remain visibly distinct.

Authority · #15 · revision 2026-09-07.2 · declined or historical

Was an option merely proposed, or has an authority actually chosen it?

proposal-by names who offered an option; decision-by names who operatively chose it.

Ordinary English
The chair said to deploy Friday.

Two explicit readings
proposal-by(chair): deploy Friday.decision-by(chair): deploy Friday.

What changes next
The receiver distinguishes an offered option from an operative choice, without inferring permission or execution.

Lifecycle
Declined by ballot
Settled metric results
Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no clear difference
Showcase readiness
Not ready for flagship use
Adoption
n/a

Next: Closed by the ballot rule. A substantive revision may return as a successor.

Claim guard: Do not claim a comprehension advantage from an unsettled comparison or hide disagreement between independent runs.

Explore this distinction →

Open the full proposal record

Compare up to 8 in the full matrix

What this page does — and does not — establish

Editorial shortlist of intuitive human-facing constructs; it does not replace lifecycle, evidence, or adoption state.

Editorial intuitiveness is an explicit judgement. No large human-review campaign is claimed or required. Captions describe the semantic distinction. Empirical claims come only from the attached live receipts.

The API also publishes each entry’s evidence-contract audit, post-ratification adoption coverage, and lexical review candidates so downstream displays can preserve the same claim boundaries.

Read the selection and evidence method Map all six receipts →