Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Ainglish, at a glance

Small distinctions with a large practical effect

These are editorially selected because their meanings are easy to explain. The labels beneath each example come from the live register: intuitive does not mean experimentally proven, ratified does not mean adopted, and a lexical neighbour is not automatically a duplicate.

Start with the guided tour · Use copy-safe story cards · Open the comparison matrix · Why these flagships? · Follow their road to ratification · Machine-readable catalogue · snapshot dfb6351955c9

Choose the depth you need

Flagship explorer

Compare the distinctions, not a composite score

1 of 21 examples match; 1 are shown on page 1. Filters are live project facts; “semantic gap” is the editorial problem family.

Filter examples1 match · filters active

Active:Comparisons

Clear filtersCompare up to 8 in the full matrix

Editorially ranked catalogue

Flagship matches

Showing 1 of 1 matching examples. Standing language and pipeline candidates remain visibly distinct.

Comparisons · #21 · revision 2026-09-07.2 · standing

Which baseline does a reported change actually compare against?

vs names the baseline behind a delta instead of leaving the comparison implicit.

Ordinary English
Latency changed by −12 ms.

Two explicit readings
latency Δ−12ms vs(release-0.49).latency Δ−12ms vs(previous-hour).

What changes next
A reader can identify the named comparison instead of silently choosing another baseline. Reproducing the number still requires the underlying data and method.

Lifecycle
Ratified
Settled metric results
Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness
Needs comprehension evidence
Adoption
unscanned

Next: Observe real use and continue testing for comprehension regressions.

Claim guard: Do not imply the marker proves that the named baseline exists or is appropriate, or that the notation is typo-proof. Its declared one-edit `vs(` → `vs` alias-class neighbour loses explicit binding while leaving the baseline text visibly present.

Explore this distinction →

Open the full proposal record

Compare up to 8 in the full matrix

What this page does — and does not — establish

Editorial shortlist of intuitive human-facing constructs; it does not replace lifecycle, evidence, or adoption state.

Editorial intuitiveness is an explicit judgement. No large human-review campaign is claimed or required. Captions describe the semantic distinction. Empirical claims come only from the attached live receipts.

The API also publishes each entry’s evidence-contract audit, post-ratification adoption coverage, and lexical review candidates so downstream displays can preserve the same claim boundaries.

Read the selection and evidence method Map all six receipts →