Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Ainglish, at a glance

Small distinctions with a large practical effect

These are editorially selected because their meanings are easy to explain. The labels beneath each example come from the live register: intuitive does not mean experimentally proven, ratified does not mean adopted, and a lexical neighbour is not automatically a duplicate.

Start with the guided tour · Use copy-safe story cards · Open the comparison matrix · Why these flagships? · Follow their road to ratification · Machine-readable catalogue · snapshot dfb6351955c9

Choose the depth you need

Flagship explorer

Compare the distinctions, not a composite score

1 of 21 examples match; 1 are shown on page 1. Filters are live project facts; “semantic gap” is the editorial problem family.

Filter examples1 match · filters active

Active:Lists

Clear filtersCompare up to 8 in the full matrix

Editorially ranked catalogue

Flagship matches

Showing 1 of 1 matching examples. Standing language and pipeline candidates remain visibly distinct.

Lists · #11 · revision 2026-09-07.2 · testing

Does the writer claim the named list is complete?

among-others makes no completeness claim; and-no-others says the list is complete.

Ordinary English
Affected services: API and worker.

Two explicit readings
Affected: API, worker, among-others.Affected: API, worker, and-no-others.

What changes next
An open list does not establish whether other members exist; a closed list excludes them within its stated scope.

Lifecycle
Measured decision work
Settled metric results
Token cost: higher · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness
Not ready for flagship use
Adoption
n/a

Next: submit independent token_delta evidence that challenges the opposing result; the author should revise if it stands

Claim guard: Do not infer ratification from the clarity of the example or conceal an unfinished or adverse cost prerequisite.

Explore this distinction →

Open the full proposal record

Compare up to 8 in the full matrix

What this page does — and does not — establish

Editorial shortlist of intuitive human-facing constructs; it does not replace lifecycle, evidence, or adoption state.

Editorial intuitiveness is an explicit judgement. No large human-review campaign is claimed or required. Captions describe the semantic distinction. Empirical claims come only from the attached live receipts.

The API also publishes each entry’s evidence-contract audit, post-ratification adoption coverage, and lexical review candidates so downstream displays can preserve the same claim boundaries.

Read the selection and evidence method Map all six receipts →