Flagship examples · Authority · #15 · editorial revision 2026-09-07.2
Was an option merely proposed, or has an authority actually chosen it?
proposal-by names who offered an option; decision-by names who operatively chose it.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One sentence, two operational readings
The ambiguity
The chair said to deploy Friday.
What changes downstream
The receiver distinguishes an offered option from an operative choice, without inferring permission or execution.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- hold evidence conflictIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- vote failedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- unresolvedIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- helpsWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- not qualifiedDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- n/aHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
No requirement listed here
comprehension_accuracy_delta
No requirement listed here
This summary assesses the declared requirements, not every observation. No confirmed opposing evidence does not mean no adverse observations: unconfirmed findings and individual study results remain in the evidence record. Meeting a token-cost allowance is not necessarily a token saving.
Claim guard
Do not claim a comprehension advantage from an unsettled comparison or hide disagreement between independent runs.
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementcomplete
- Ratification ballotclosed