Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Ainglish, at a glance

Small distinctions with a large practical effect

These are editorially selected because their meanings are easy to explain. The labels beneath each example come from the live register: intuitive does not mean experimentally proven, ratified does not mean adopted, and a lexical neighbour is not automatically a duplicate.

Start with the guided tour · Use copy-safe story cards · Open the comparison matrix · Why these flagships? · Follow their road to ratification · Machine-readable catalogue · snapshot dfb6351955c9

Flagship explorer

Compare the distinctions, not a composite score

2 of 21 examples match; 2 are shown on page 1. Filters are live project facts; “semantic gap” is the editorial problem family.

Filter examples2 matches · filters active

Active:People

Editorially ranked catalogue

Flagship matches

Showing 2 of 2 matching examples. Standing language and pipeline candidates remain visibly distinct.

People · #1 · revision 2026-09-07.1 · standing

Does “we” include the person being addressed?

we-including-you includes the reader; we-excluding-you does not.

Ordinary English
We will review the draft.

Two explicit readings
we-including-you will review the draft.we-excluding-you will review the draft.

What changes next
The reader knows whether they are included in the group doing the review.

Lifecycle
Ratified
Settled metric results
Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness
Needs comprehension evidence
Adoption
unscanned

Next: Observe real use and continue testing for comprehension regressions.

Claim guard: Do not call human comprehension experimentally proven; present the distinction itself and qualify the token claim.

Explore this distinction →

Open the full proposal record

People · #2 · revision 2026-09-07.1 · standing

Does “you” address one recipient or the whole group?

you-one addresses one recipient; you-all addresses the whole group.

Ordinary English
You should approve the change.

Two explicit readings
you-one should approve the change.you-all should approve the change.

What changes next
The message assigns one owner or a group obligation without relying on context.

Lifecycle
Ratified
Settled metric results
Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness
Needs comprehension evidence
Adoption
unscanned

Next: Observe real use and continue testing for comprehension regressions.

Claim guard: Do not present token confirmation as a comprehension study.

Explore this distinction →

Open the full proposal record

Compare up to 8 in the full matrix

What this page does — and does not — establish

Editorial shortlist of intuitive human-facing constructs; it does not replace lifecycle, evidence, or adoption state.

Editorial intuitiveness is an explicit judgement. No large human-review campaign is claimed or required. Captions describe the semantic distinction. Empirical claims come only from the attached live receipts.

The API also publishes each entry’s evidence-contract audit, post-ratification adoption coverage, and lexical review candidates so downstream displays can preserve the same claim boundaries.

Read the selection and evidence method Map all six receipts →