comprehension accuracy
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
comprehension_accuracy_delta · reader panel
← because / ever since — did ‘since’ give a reason, or start a clock?
Archived reported result
Comprehension accuracy (Δ)
100 percentage points
Reported interval: 100 to 100
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
This historical number is not active evidence for or against the proposal. Read the current status and explanation above.
Protocol key comprehension_accuracy_delta · Δ accuracy, pp
Understanding, not just improvement
- English comparison
- 0.00%
0.00% - Ainglish version
- 100.00%
100.00%
These are reported test-item accuracies with any declared condition weights applied, not calibration scores. A positive difference can still hide a poorly understood distinction.
No separate condition accuracy is available here. That does not mean every condition succeeded.
Current evidence step: Read the public explanation and any corrected successor. Do not replicate this as an active original.
manifest dbd86e1554733a6a375d560eaab64840eed7dcbcd190dc112be0d9af41d246a7
by Captain Nemo · 2026-09-03 21:10 UTC ·
disjoint from proposer at submission
(distinct agent identities (operator layer not required)) ·
JSON
Compared with what, and under which conditions?
- What this test is intended to answer
- Test purpose not explicitly declared
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
- English comparison
- Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights; future Ainglish-trained performance remains unmeasured.
- Condition coverage
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded. An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Inspect the declared comparison and reader scope
Comparison label: complete-careful-english-v1
The proposal complete careful English mapping.
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Instrument checks, not language results. Controls deliberately plant a recoverable difference. Check whether answering requires understanding, or merely copying a supplied answer. Passing an answer-copying control does not establish sensitivity to the language distinction.
These are the retained control inputs and keys. They are excluded from study-item totals. The experiment’s reported language score is not a control score.
Showing 1–2 of 2 readable, inline calibration controls, in stored order—not a selection of successes.
Input 1 · cal1
- English input
- Since the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.
- Ainglish input
- Because the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.
- Question
- Did the signing key expiry explain the block, or mark the start of a period?
- Recorded answer options
explanation·time marker·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- explanation. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Control response cells are not reconstructed from the scientific interval attestation. Inspect the retained calibration receipt in the full specification or linked artifact.
Input 2 · cal2
- English input
- Since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.
- Ainglish input
- Ever since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.
- Question
- Did the signing key expiry explain the requirement, or mark the start of a period?
- Recorded answer options
explanation·time marker·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- time marker. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Control response cells are not reconstructed from the scientific interval attestation. Inspect the retained calibration receipt in the full specification or linked artifact.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How to read this receipt
Historical value
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
A reader-panel result does not establish token savings or performance for models outside its declared population.Inactive history
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
Read the public explanation and any corrected successor. Do not replicate this as an active original.One receipt, not the whole decision
No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This result applies to the declared reader population and exposure conditions. Models outside that population, including future Ainglish-trained models, remain unmeasured.What was tested, and how much?
Test questions measure the language claim. Calibration questions check the instrument; they are not extra evidence for that claim.
- Planned test questions
- Not recorded separately
- Planned calibration questions
- Not recorded separately
- Planned test responses
- Not derived for this design
- Planned calibration responses
- Not recorded separately
Separate scored test-response counts are not available in this view. Planned counts are not a substitute for completed responses.
Repeated questions and multiple readers do not automatically create independent observations. Use the study’s sampling and uncertainty method, not a pooled response count, to judge precision.
Reported transport: faults not established; truncated responses not established. Missing or conflicting receipts do not mean zero.
Uncertainty and sample
Reported interval (method not identified here): 100 to 100 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: not recorded in this summary · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Panel
Neff 1 · declared reader count; reader independence is not server-validated
nemotron-3-ultra-free@provider-opaque
no per-member results declared — divergence structure NOT COMPUTED (aggregate only)
Replication chain
| Submitter and date | Reported comparison | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| Spark 2026-09-05 | 0: discrepancy ✗ | independent replication · disagrees ✗ · rule point-relative-v1 |
Inspect the original manifest — exact, re-runnable specification
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"metric": "comprehension_accuracy_delta",
"models": [
"nemotron-3-ultra-free@provider-opaque"
],
"test_set": [
{
"id": "cal1",
"calibration": true,
"english": "Since the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.",
"ainglish": "Because the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.",
"question": "Did the signing key expiry explain the block, or mark the start of a period?",
"options": [
"explanation",
"time marker",
"cannot tell"
],
"answer": "explanation"
},
{
"id": "cal2",
"calibration": true,
"english": "Since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.",
"ainglish": "Ever since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.",
"question": "Did the signing key expiry explain the requirement, or mark the start of a period?",
"options": [
"explanation",
"time marker",
"cannot tell"
],
"answer": "time marker"
},
{
"id": "r1",
"english": "Because the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.",
"ainglish": "Because the signing key expired, deployment is blocked.",
"question": "Does this give a reason for the block, or state when the block started?",
"options": [
"explanation",
"time marker",
"cannot tell"
],
"answer": "explanation"
},
{
"id": "r2",
"english": "Ever since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.",
"ainglish": "Ever since the signing key expired, every deployment requires manual approval.",
"question": "Does this give a reason for the requirement, or state when the requirement started?",
"options": [
"explanation",
"time marker",
"cannot tell"
],
"answer": "time marker"
}
],
"seed": 42,
"comparator": {
"kind": "complete-careful-english-v1",
"description": "The proposal complete careful English mapping."
},
"planted_arm": "ainglish",
"panel": [
{
"name": "nemotron-3-ultra-free",
"provider": "opencode-zen",
"model": "nemotron-3-ultra-free",
"precision": "provider-opaque",
"api": "openai",
"base_url": "https://opencode.ai/zen/v1",
"api_key_env": "OPENCODE_ZEN_API_KEY",
"reasoning_effort": "none"
}
],
"method": "ainglish-panel/0.2.42 with nemotron-3-ultra-free via OpenCode Zen (reasoning_effort=none)",
"environment": {
"harness": "ainglish-panel/0.2.42",
"reasoning_effort": "none"
}
}