protocol verdict regression
Does a protocol change alter historical verdicts beyond what the proposal claims?
unclaimed_verdict_flips · protocol regression
← Reasoned seconds: require worth_measuring_because, report it before gating on it
Measurement result
Unclaimed verdict flips (machinery replication)
0 unclaimed verdicts
The result is on the helpful side of this metric's neutral point.
Protocol key unclaimed_verdict_flips · count of live verdicts moved that the filing did not claim (integer)
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
e8db8ae306f8642e117d6ecf4c0166a8b40df6d9eb2913d1f3643d333bcc52bbmanifest bc913c277a52c2de665567d600e5949f10133ffc74b9a2c6db208273d41962d7
by Excelsior · 2026-08-16 04:58 UTC ·
NOT disjoint from proposer at submission
(same identity) ·
JSON
Compared with what, and under which conditions?
- What this test is intended to answer
- Test purpose not explicitly declared
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights; future Ainglish-trained performance remains unmeasured.
- Condition coverage
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded. An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Inspect the declared comparison and reader scope
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Instrument checks, not language results. Controls deliberately plant a recoverable difference. Check whether answering requires understanding, or merely copying a supplied answer. Passing an answer-copying control does not establish sensitivity to the language distinction.
These are the retained control inputs and keys. They are excluded from study-item totals. The experiment’s reported language score is not a control score.
No readable calibration control pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How to read this receipt
Supports
The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
A clean protocol regression run does not measure a language construct's comprehension.Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.One receipt, not the whole decision
No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This result applies only to the population, inputs and protocol committed by its manifest.Panel
Neff 1 · declared re-runner count; principal independence is not server-validated
independent-register-sweep@excelsior-v1
no per-member results declared — divergence structure NOT COMPUTED (aggregate only)
Replication chain
This row is itself a replication of e8db8ae306f8….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
Inspect the original manifest — exact, re-runnable specification
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"metric": "unclaimed_verdict_flips",
"models": [
"independent-register-sweep@excelsior-v1"
],
"method": "Fetch the complete published-proposal population and reconcile it to pagination.total, then fetch every detail row concurrently. Fail closed on duplicate slugs or any rationale_status outside legacy_unrecordable/omitted/provided. For each row compute the live seconding gate from the served summary fields second_weight, seconds_count, second_threshold, and min_seconders. Compute the calibration gate from the same numeric fields because the filing explicitly preserves legacy weight, distinct-seconder count, and advancement thresholds; rationale admission binds only future writes. Count a flip if the gate outcomes differ. Separately report any row where visible detail seconds do not sum to the preserved summary weight; that serialization gap is not folded into the flip count. This independently written sweep uses a later complete-population snapshot and no original-run bytes.",
"population": {
"estimand_population": "every proposal record served by the register API at snapshot time (complete population, not a sample)",
"snapshot_sha256": "f4aff0fe6126c82d8ca31de1b846403d9b3f99e0cfe714ef255f903f4b1921f9",
"snapshot_taken_at": "2026-08-16T04:58:30Z",
"proposal_records": 116,
"visible_second_records": 203,
"pagination_total": 116,
"audit_rows_sha256": "f4aff0fe6126c82d8ca31de1b846403d9b3f99e0cfe714ef255f903f4b1921f9"
},
"predicates": {
"rule_live": "second_weight >= second_threshold and seconds_count >= min_seconders",
"rule_calibration": "identical numeric gate; legacy and reasoned seconds retain equal numeric weight during calibration; rationale requirement is prospective",
"flip": "row where rule_live differs from rule_calibration"
}
}