Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?review-due(t; by=reviewer) — a review deadline is not an expiry date2026-09-30 16:00 UTCreview-due(t; by=reviewer) — a review deadline is not an expiry date2026-09-30 16:32 UTC
What was measured?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?-8.875 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -10.625 to -8.875Counts in current evidence decisions-8.75 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -10.125 to -8.75Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehensionEnglish comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
64 prospectively authored review-only records, eight in each of eight equally weighted declared domains; one fixed complete-message renderer and three named tiktoken 0.14.0 encodings.
Second result
64 prospectively authored review-only records, eight in each of eight equally weighted declared domains; one fixed complete-message renderer and three named tiktoken 0.14.0 encodings.
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
The complete English message and complete affirmative review-due message, with operative state, same reference, inclusive UTC review deadline and responsible reviewer. No external legend tokens.
Second result
The complete English message and complete affirmative review-due message, with operative state, same reference, inclusive UTC review deadline and responsible reviewer. No external legend tokens.
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "Mean paired token delta within each domain; equal-weight mean of eight domains for each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Report domain strata under that globally least-favourable tokenizer, plus all domain-by-tokenizer means. The declared prerequisite bound is at most +3 tokens."
}
Second result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "Mean paired token delta within each domain; equal-weight mean of eight domains for each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Report domain strata under that globally least-favourable tokenizer, plus all domain-by-tokenizer means. The declared prerequisite bound is at most +3 tokens."
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    {
        "id": "access-grants",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "policy-exceptions",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "risk-acceptances",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "model-evaluations",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "certificates",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "deployment-approvals",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "contracts",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "data-retention-rules",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
Second result
[
    {
        "id": "access-grants",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "policy-exceptions",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "risk-acceptances",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "model-evaluations",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "certificates",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "deployment-approvals",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "contracts",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "data-retention-rules",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
First result: full recordtoken cost · -8.875 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-30 16:00 UTC

review-due(t; by=reviewer) — a review deadline is not an expiry date

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-8.875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -10.625 to -8.875.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 8 declared conditions

access-grants, policy-exceptions, risk-acceptances, model-evaluations, certificates, deployment-approvals, contracts, data-retention-rules

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -8.875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
access-grants-8.875 Not recorded
policy-exceptions-8.875 Not recorded
risk-acceptances-8.875 Not recorded
model-evaluations-8.875 Not recorded
certificates-8.875 Not recorded
deployment-approvals-8.875 Not recorded
contracts-8.875 Not recorded
data-retention-rules-8.875 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-1

English input
Operative access grant Archive-601: Arden must review by 2027-01-11T00:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Archive-601 review-due(2027-01-11T00:00:00Z; by=Arden).
Condition
access-grants

Input 2 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-2

English input
Operative access grant Sensor-602: Bela must review by 2027-01-12T03:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Sensor-602 review-due(2027-01-12T03:00:00Z; by=Bela).
Condition
access-grants

Input 3 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-3

English input
Operative access grant Visitor-603: Cato must review by 2027-01-13T06:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Visitor-603 review-due(2027-01-13T06:00:00Z; by=Cato).
Condition
access-grants

Input 4 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-4

English input
Operative access grant Workshop-604: Dara must review by 2027-01-14T09:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Workshop-604 review-due(2027-01-14T09:00:00Z; by=Dara).
Condition
access-grants

Input 5 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-5

English input
Operative access grant Dataset-605: Elin must review by 2027-01-15T12:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Dataset-605 review-due(2027-01-15T12:00:00Z; by=Elin).
Condition
access-grants

Input 6 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-6

English input
Operative access grant Tunnel-606: Faris must review by 2027-01-16T15:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Tunnel-606 review-due(2027-01-16T15:00:00Z; by=Faris).
Condition
access-grants

Recorded input digest: 36fa2532e50b0e27b7944c22b01441fa948a50a3823f1f3ef0b25f97e4c49fb2

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish tokens minus complete careful-English tokens for the same meaning; negative values mean fewer tokens. Comparator explicitly preserves continuation despite lateness alone and no promised outcome.
Tested population
64 prospectively authored review-only records, eight in each of eight equally weighted declared domains; one fixed complete-message renderer and three named tiktoken 0.14.0 encodings.
Unit tested
The complete English message and complete affirmative review-due message, with operative state, same reference, inclusive UTC review deadline and responsible reviewer. No external legend tokens.
How results combine
Mean paired token delta within each domain; equal-weight mean of eight domains for each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Report domain strata under that globally least-favourable tokenizer, plus all domain-by-tokenizer means. The declared prerequisite bound is at most +3 tokens.

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -10.625
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.875
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -8.875
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "access-grants",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "policy-exceptions",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "risk-acceptances",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "model-evaluations",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "certificates",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "deployment-approvals",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "contracts",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "data-retention-rules",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 38573888-1da3-4e5a-b0b6-960f214f8646
Content 50c70d40b8764a23de173e70172f271a161f387fc0fa2e75e7f46420da2f8cd6

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -8.75 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-30 16:32 UTC

review-due(t; by=reviewer) — a review deadline is not an expiry date

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-8.75 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -10.125 to -8.75.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 8 declared conditions

access-grants, policy-exceptions, risk-acceptances, model-evaluations, certificates, deployment-approvals, contracts, data-retention-rules

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -8.75 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -8.75 tokens; the named original reported -8.875.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 64 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 64 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity50c70d40b8764a23de173e70172f271a161f387fc0fa2e75e7f46420da2f8cd6

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
access-grants-8.75 Not recorded
policy-exceptions-8.75 Not recorded
risk-acceptances-8.75 Not recorded
model-evaluations-8.75 Not recorded
certificates-8.75 Not recorded
deployment-approvals-8.75 Not recorded
contracts-8.75 Not recorded
data-retention-rules-8.75 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-1

English input
Operative access grant Observatory-801: Iona must review by 2028-01-03T00:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Observatory-801 review-due(2028-01-03T00:30:00Z; by=Iona).
Condition
access-grants

Input 2 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-2

English input
Operative access grant Greenhouse-802: Jules must review by 2028-01-04T02:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant Greenhouse-802 review-due(2028-01-04T02:30:00Z; by=Jules).
Condition
access-grants

Input 3 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-3

English input
Operative access grant ReadingRoom-803: Keira must review by 2028-01-05T04:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant ReadingRoom-803 review-due(2028-01-05T04:30:00Z; by=Keira).
Condition
access-grants

Input 4 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-4

English input
Operative access grant PumpStation-804: Luca must review by 2028-01-06T06:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant PumpStation-804 review-due(2028-01-06T06:30:00Z; by=Luca).
Condition
access-grants

Input 5 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-5

English input
Operative access grant ArtVault-805: Mira must review by 2028-01-07T08:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant ArtVault-805 review-due(2028-01-07T08:30:00Z; by=Mira).
Condition
access-grants

Input 6 · dex-reviewdue-20260930-1-6

English input
Operative access grant ServerRoom-806: Nolan must review by 2028-01-08T10:30:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
Ainglish input
Operative access grant ServerRoom-806 review-due(2028-01-08T10:30:00Z; by=Nolan).
Condition
access-grants

Recorded input digest: b71419db8fe0c292dfbcfe6ec07376e222b3a93a9d944cae896b09c63c2bf82f

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish tokens minus complete careful-English tokens for the same meaning; negative values mean fewer tokens. Comparator explicitly preserves continuation despite lateness alone and no promised outcome.
Tested population
64 prospectively authored review-only records, eight in each of eight equally weighted declared domains; one fixed complete-message renderer and three named tiktoken 0.14.0 encodings.
Unit tested
The complete English message and complete affirmative review-due message, with operative state, same reference, inclusive UTC review deadline and responsible reviewer. No external legend tokens.
How results combine
Mean paired token delta within each domain; equal-weight mean of eight domains for each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Report domain strata under that globally least-favourable tokenizer, plus all domain-by-tokenizer means. The declared prerequisite bound is at most +3 tokens.

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -10.125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.875
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -8.75
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "access-grants",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "policy-exceptions",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "risk-acceptances",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "model-evaluations",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "certificates",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "deployment-approvals",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "contracts",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "data-retention-rules",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.125,
        "value": -8.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt a691a60c-ec70-41a8-ab4b-73f5e41e231d
Content 08acc2682e7be1b73fa39b4e1b29a47ce58fb14d11115d4897ea4ef9ae03677f

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.