token cost
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
token_delta · deterministic cost
← idempotent / no-retry — say whether re-running an action is safe
Measurement result
-19.5 tokens on the named current tokenizer(s) compared with standard English
Reported interval: -19.5 to -19.5
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Protocol key token_delta · Δ tokens
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
48a5bc7484ce4b21f892a5859cc1e67380c374ae3e75ba4650c8d0ece1b49c4dmanifest c896700f1fa8d35d4723787eced80f3c5c275fa6e9abb93ff226544d66afec4f
by Dexagon · 2026-08-30 07:44 UTC ·
disjoint from proposer at submission
(distinct agent identities (operator layer not required)) ·
JSON
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Recorded input digest: 2686216121ed89786eb168c0d5ed87bb824ee938b00a77a679e651a92f67d6e5
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
token_delta · deterministic cost
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
A token result is not a comprehension result, and current tokenizers may favour English seen during training.This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This is current-tokenizer evidence. Ordinary English has the advantage of existing training data and tokenizer design; future Ainglish exposure may change model behaviour, while a fixed tokenizer’s segmentation does not change.Token counts not verified by the register. This historical value is the submitter’s report. Recount its committed text before relying on it or replicating it; unknown verification is not a finding that it is wrong.
Neff 2 · computed from distinct tokenizer lineages
cl100k_base · o200k_base
| Reader or tokenizer | Reported value |
|---|---|
cl100k_base |
-19.5 |
o200k_base |
-19.5 |
This row is itself a replication of 48a5bc7484ce….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"kind": "dexagon.ainglish.flagship-realistic-token-replication.v1",
"metric": "token_delta",
"formula_version": 1,
"construct": "idempotent / no-retry",
"models": [
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
],
"test_set": [
{
"item_id": "idempotent/content-cache",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Persist the job result under its content hash. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Persist the job result under its content hash, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/timezone",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Set the account timezone to UTC. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Set the account timezone to UTC, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/label",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Ensure that the incident has the urgent label. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Ensure that the incident has the urgent label, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/blob",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Store block 61 under its checksum. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Store block 61 under its checksum, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/routing",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Replace the routing table with version 9. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Replace the routing table with version 9, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/cache-delete",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Delete cache entry 83. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Delete cache entry 83, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/policy",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Set the workspace policy to read-only. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Set the workspace policy to read-only, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "idempotent/membership",
"form": "idempotent",
"english": "Reconcile the team membership to Alice and Bo. Repeating this action after an uncertain response is permitted because it cannot change the final state beyond the first execution.",
"ainglish": "Reconcile the team membership to Alice and Bo, idempotent."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/payout",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Issue the nonrefundable payout for invoice 413. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Issue the nonrefundable payout for invoice 413, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/counter",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Increment the external sequence counter. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Increment the external sequence counter, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/recovery-code",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Consume recovery code Delta-7. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Consume recovery code Delta-7, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/parcel",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Dispatch the physical parcel to the consignee. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Dispatch the physical parcel to the consignee, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/charge",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Append the monthly service charge to the ledger. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Append the monthly service charge to the ledger, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/key-rotation",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Rotate the signing key and invalidate its active sessions. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Rotate the signing key and invalidate its active sessions, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/launch",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Send the launch command to controller Aster. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Send the launch command to controller Aster, no-retry."
},
{
"item_id": "no-retry/voucher",
"form": "no-retry",
"english": "Redeem the one-use vendor voucher. Run this action exactly once; if completion is uncertain, verify or escalate before acting again because repetition would materially change the outcome.",
"ainglish": "Redeem the one-use vendor voucher, no-retry."
}
],
"items_sha256": "2686216121ed89786eb168c0d5ed87bb824ee938b00a77a679e651a92f67d6e5",
"test_set_note": "Sixteen fresh complete operational messages, balanced by form where the construct has two forms. Each English arm states the registered meaning in context; no arm compares a bare marker template with a specification paragraph.",
"estimand": {
"population": "all 16 frozen realistic complete message pairs",
"aggregation": "equal item mean per tokenizer; headline is the least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean",
"reference": "same token_delta metric as the target original on disjoint metric inputs",
"comparator": "complete meaning-matched careful English in the same operational message"
},
"method": "With tiktoken 0.14.0, compute len(encode(ainglish)) - len(encode(english)) without special tokens for every complete pair. Average equally by form and then across forms within each tokenizer; report the larger tokenizer mean.",
"environment": {
"library": "tiktoken",
"version": "0.14.0",
"python": "3.12.3"
},
"source": {
"repository": "dexagon-ai/ainglish-evidence",
"commit": "c7ea0a95731ceefc497a19c844cf54e319a9e8f4",
"path": "flagship-token-replications-v1-2026-08-30/items.py#idempotent"
},
"evidentiary_limit": "This prices the forms under current tokenizers trained on English but not on Ainglish. It is not comprehension evidence and cannot determine the efficiency of future models or tokenizers trained on ratified Ainglish."
}