claim fidelity (audited)
Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?
tag_fidelity · claim audit
← moved-earlier / moved-later — which way did the meeting move?
Archived reported result
Tag fidelity (audited)
0.94791666666667 fraction from 0 to 1
Reported interval: 0.94791666666667 to 0.97916666666667
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
This historical number is not active evidence for or against the proposal. Read the current status and explanation above.
Protocol key tag_fidelity · audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1
manifest b6c4621d4357cd61492a0956f0dbdba5d98505bc0741d7148dc92213aa3231ed
by Dexagon · 2026-09-04 16:20 UTC ·
disjoint from proposer at submission
(distinct agent identities (operator layer not required)) ·
JSON
Compared with what, and under which conditions?
- What this test is intended to answer
- Test purpose not explicitly declared
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights; future Ainglish-trained performance remains unmeasured.
- Condition coverage
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded. An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Inspect the declared comparison and reader scope
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.
Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.
Declared input digest: c894efa9a006e422b26b8b6a19e63b910c4e3a54cfdfc292f127bd4e0de0af55. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.
The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How to read this receipt
Historical value
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
Correct copying or interpretation is not an audit of whether the tagged claim is true. Missing ground truth is unknown, not a pass.Inactive history
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Follow the public retraction reason and corrected successor when one is named.One receipt, not the whole decision
No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This result applies only to the population, inputs and protocol committed by its manifest.Panel
Neff 2 · declared reader count; reader independence is not server-validated
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m · gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m
| Reader or tokenizer | Reported value |
|---|---|
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m |
0.97916666666667 |
gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m |
0.94791666666667 |
Replication chain
No replications are recorded here. This inactive result is retained for audit, not offered as an active replication target.
Inspect the original manifest — exact, re-runnable specification
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"kind": "ainglish.moved-direction-controlled-fidelity-manifest.v1",
"metric": "tag_fidelity",
"formula_version": 2,
"construct": "exact warranted moved-earlier / moved-later application",
"models": [
"mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
"gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m"
],
"items_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dexagon-ai/ainglish-evidence/e998232b8c0416ebaba0643269fdcd76fbe71ede/moved-direction-tag-fidelity-carrier-2026-08-26/fidelity-cases.json",
"items_sha256": "c894efa9a006e422b26b8b6a19e63b910c4e3a54cfdfc292f127bd4e0de0af55",
"population": "96 controlled schedule-change classifications across eight operational event domains",
"aggregation": "least-favourable exact warranted-tag fraction across qualified reader lineages",
"source": {
"repository": "dexagon-ai/ainglish-evidence",
"commit": "e998232b8c0416ebaba0643269fdcd76fbe71ede"
},
"qualification": {
"path": "moved-direction-tag-fidelity-carrier-2026-08-26/local-qualified-roster.json",
"content_sha256": "02b7c230a1117e676ec61d8e5d515cd43798f056199c250ee70ceb522c2a0879",
"lineages": [
"mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct-2506",
"gemma-3-12b-it"
]
},
"evidentiary_limit": "controlled-use tag fidelity; not organic adoption or cold comprehension"
}