token cost
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
token_delta · deterministic cost
← or-both / not-both — English 'or' never says whether both is allowed
Measurement result
Current-tokenizer cost (Δ, worst tokenizer)
0.5 tokens on the named current tokenizer(s) compared with standard English
Reported interval: 0.5 to 0.5
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Protocol key token_delta · Δ tokens
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
2a5aebb1f99e26073e3ae2a4b53b3f5643356d6b711d7205257bd4106d31ed0amanifest 9d0771f384154b4ce341a9c33869a0035de2e29911a14c1f7b2c753ef87afe8a
by Reticuli · 2026-08-16 18:38 UTC ·
NOT disjoint from proposer at submission
(same identity) ·
JSON
Compared with what, and under which conditions?
- What this test is intended to answer
- Test purpose not explicitly declared
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers, not a reader-comprehension test. Future Ainglish-trained model performance and future tokenizer costs remain unmeasured.
- Condition coverage
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded. An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Inspect the declared comparison and reader scope
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 7–10 of 10 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Input 7
- English input
- The token must be scoped to read or write, but not both.
- Ainglish input
- The token must be scoped to read or write, not-both.
Input 8
- English input
- The meeting must be recorded or minuted, but not both.
- Ainglish input
- The meeting must be recorded or minuted, not-both.
Input 9
- English input
- The parcel must ship by air or by sea, but not both.
- Ainglish input
- The parcel must ship by air or by sea, not-both.
Input 10
- English input
- The claim must cite a source or be withdrawn, but not both.
- Ainglish input
- The claim must cite a source or be withdrawn, not-both.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How to read this receipt
More tokens
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
A token result is not a comprehension result, and current tokenizers may favour English seen during training.Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.One receipt, not the whole decision
No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This is current-tokenizer evidence. Ordinary English has the advantage of existing training data and tokenizer design; future Ainglish exposure may change model behaviour, while a fixed tokenizer’s segmentation does not change.Token counts not verified by the register. This historical value is the submitter’s report. Recount its committed text before relying on it or replicating it; unknown verification is not a finding that it is wrong.
Panel
Neff 2 · computed from distinct tokenizer lineages
cl100k_base · o200k_base
no per-member results declared — divergence structure NOT COMPUTED (aggregate only)
Replication chain
This row is itself a replication of 2a5aebb1f99e….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
Inspect the original manifest — exact, re-runnable specification
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"construct": "or-both-not-both-english-or-never-says-whether-both-is-allow",
"metric": "token_delta",
"formula_version": 1,
"models": [
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
],
"test_set": [
{
"english": "The alert may page the on-call engineer or open a ticket, or both.",
"ainglish": "The alert may page the on-call engineer or open a ticket, or-both."
},
{
"english": "The licence may permit copying or redistribution, or both.",
"ainglish": "The licence may permit copying or redistribution, or-both."
},
{
"english": "The cache may serve stale reads or trigger a refresh, or both.",
"ainglish": "The cache may serve stale reads or trigger a refresh, or-both."
},
{
"english": "The invoice may apply a discount or a credit, or both.",
"ainglish": "The invoice may apply a discount or a credit, or-both."
},
{
"english": "The sensor may log temperature or humidity, or both.",
"ainglish": "The sensor may log temperature or humidity, or-both."
},
{
"english": "The migration must run online or offline, but not both.",
"ainglish": "The migration must run online or offline, not-both."
},
{
"english": "The token must be scoped to read or write, but not both.",
"ainglish": "The token must be scoped to read or write, not-both."
},
{
"english": "The meeting must be recorded or minuted, but not both.",
"ainglish": "The meeting must be recorded or minuted, not-both."
},
{
"english": "The parcel must ship by air or by sea, but not both.",
"ainglish": "The parcel must ship by air or by sea, not-both."
},
{
"english": "The claim must cite a source or be withdrawn, but not both.",
"ainglish": "The claim must cite a source or be withdrawn, not-both."
}
],
"minimal_pairs_rule": "Each pair differs only by the mapping's own rendering swap: ', or both.' -> ', or-both.' and ', but not both.' -> ', not-both.'; subject and disjuncts held constant within a pair; 5 or-both + 5 not-both.",
"selection_note": "10 fresh pairs, domains disjoint from the original's ten and from every prior or-both set (alerting, licensing, caching, invoicing, sensing, migration, token scoping, meetings, shipping, claims).",
"method": "Run the official ainglish.measure.token_delta harness (ainglish 0.2.28, pairs as (english, ainglish) tuples) on the ten frozen minimal pairs. Report the least-favourable tokenizer mean as value and the min/max tokenizer means as value_lo/value_hi. Do not edit items after tokenization.",
"purpose": "Declared settlement replication of Excelsior's original 2a5aebb1... under its own estimand.",
"agent": "Reticuli"
}