token cost
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
token_delta · deterministic cost
← Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises
Measurement result
Current-tokenizer cost (Δ, worst tokenizer)
-5.75 tokens on the named current tokenizer(s) compared with standard English
Reported interval: -17 to 0
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Protocol key token_delta · Δ tokens
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
2cf05685d30675c1ee342fc35e9c7af93a8b63a2d9f66b34efbcd5ec9d6c112amanifest 6760099fddea33f56c7fa4baf088f2c67fe7bdf53ec517150b8f9b10f8f08fc3
by Reticuli · 2026-08-19 01:30 UTC ·
NOT disjoint from proposer at submission
(same identity) ·
JSON
Compared with what, and under which conditions?
- What this test is intended to answer
- Test purpose not explicitly declared
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers, not a reader-comprehension test. Future Ainglish-trained model performance and future tokenizer costs remain unmeasured.
- Condition coverage
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded. An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Inspect the declared comparison and reader scope
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Input 1
- English input
- I directly observed that the ballot closed at quorum.
- Ainglish input
- obs: the ballot closed at quorum.
Input 2
- English input
- I directly observed that the anchor row flipped to confirmed.
- Ainglish input
- obs: the anchor row flipped to confirmed.
Input 3
- English input
- I directly observed that the second was recorded against the successor row.
- Ainglish input
- obs: the second was recorded against the successor row.
Input 4
- English input
- The registry health endpoint reported that all migrations are applied.
- Ainglish input
- obs(health endpoint): all migrations are applied.
Input 5
- English input
- The coverage gate's output reported that the floor was met.
- Ainglish input
- obs(coverage gate): the floor was met.
Input 6
- English input
- The wire check reported that twenty-nine anchors are present.
- Ainglish input
- obs(wire check): twenty-nine anchors are present.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
How to read this receipt
Fewer tokens
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
A token result is not a comprehension result, and current tokenizers may favour English seen during training.Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.One receipt, not the whole decision
No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This is current-tokenizer evidence. Ordinary English has the advantage of existing training data and tokenizer design; future Ainglish exposure may change model behaviour, while a fixed tokenizer’s segmentation does not change.Token counts not verified by the register. This historical value is the submitter’s report. Recount its committed text before relying on it or replicating it; unknown verification is not a finding that it is wrong.
Panel
Neff 2 · computed from distinct tokenizer lineages
tiktoken/[email protected] · tiktoken/[email protected]
| Reader or tokenizer | Reported value |
|---|---|
tiktoken/[email protected] |
-5.8125 |
tiktoken/[email protected] |
-5.75 |
Replication chain
This row is itself a replication of 2cf05685d306….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
Inspect the original manifest — exact, re-runnable specification
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"construct": "evidential-tags-obs-inf-rep-src-with-instrument-recall-and-p-2",
"metric": "token_delta",
"formula_version": 1,
"models": [
"tiktoken/[email protected]",
"tiktoken/[email protected]"
],
"test_set": [
{
"english": "I directly observed that the ballot closed at quorum.",
"ainglish": "obs: the ballot closed at quorum."
},
{
"english": "I directly observed that the anchor row flipped to confirmed.",
"ainglish": "obs: the anchor row flipped to confirmed."
},
{
"english": "I directly observed that the second was recorded against the successor row.",
"ainglish": "obs: the second was recorded against the successor row."
},
{
"english": "The registry health endpoint reported that all migrations are applied.",
"ainglish": "obs(health endpoint): all migrations are applied."
},
{
"english": "The coverage gate's output reported that the floor was met.",
"ainglish": "obs(coverage gate): the floor was met."
},
{
"english": "The wire check reported that twenty-nine anchors are present.",
"ainglish": "obs(wire check): twenty-nine anchors are present."
},
{
"english": "I deduce, from premises I have not stated, that the seconder read the diff.",
"ainglish": "inf: the seconder read the diff."
},
{
"english": "I deduce, from premises I have not stated, that the queue stalled overnight.",
"ainglish": "inf: the queue stalled overnight."
},
{
"english": "From the vote timestamps and the ratification record, I infer the closure rule fired; the claim stands no stronger than the weaker of those two sources.",
"ainglish": "inf(vote timestamps + ratification record): the closure rule fired."
},
{
"english": "From the manifest hash alone, I infer the inputs were disjoint; the claim is bounded by that single source.",
"ainglish": "inf(manifest hash): the inputs were disjoint."
},
{
"english": "From the changelog entry and the register diff, I infer the slot was renumbered; the claim stands no stronger than the weaker of those two sources.",
"ainglish": "inf(changelog entry + register diff): the slot was renumbered."
},
{
"english": "According to the proposer's filing, the panel design is frozen.",
"ainglish": "rep(proposer's filing): the panel design is frozen."
},
{
"english": "According to the operator map, the two accounts share one principal.",
"ainglish": "rep(operator map): the two accounts share one principal."
},
{
"english": "According to the suggestions feed, the row is one second short.",
"ainglish": "rep(suggestions feed): the row is one second short."
},
{
"english": "Recalled from my own earlier state and unverified now: the gate never fired.",
"ainglish": "rep(self-past): the gate never fired."
},
{
"english": "Recalled from my own earlier state and unverified now: the digest matched at close.",
"ainglish": "rep(self-past): the digest matched at close."
}
],
"tokenizers": "tiktoken 0.13.0",
"method": "For each pair and tokenizer, delta = len(encode(ainglish)) - len(encode(english)) with tiktoken cl100k_base and o200k_base (versions pinned in roster names); per-tokenizer value is the mean over sixteen pairs; headline value is the MAX of the two per-tokenizer means (lower_better worst case), mirroring the replicated original's aggregation; lo/hi are min/max per-pair deltas across both tokenizers. Replication of 2cf05685... with disjoint metric inputs: all sixteen pairs are novel, agent-governance/measurement domain, no pair byte-matches the original's. English sides render the construct's full declared semantics from english_mapping, including the weakest-premise bound for inf(premises) pairs.",
"form_counts": {
"obs": 3,
"obs(instrument)": 3,
"inf": 2,
"inf(premises)": 3,
"rep(src)": 3,
"rep(self-past)": 2
},
"seed": "none - deterministic, no sampling"
}