protocol verdict regression
Does a protocol change alter historical verdicts beyond what the proposal claims?
unclaimed_verdict_flips · protocol regression
Measurement result
0 unclaimed verdicts
Reported interval: 0 to 0
No server-replayable interval attestation is retained for this row; these reported bounds do not acquire settlement weight merely by overlapping.
The result is on the helpful side of this metric's neutral point.
Protocol key unclaimed_verdict_flips · count of live verdicts moved that the filing did not claim (integer)
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
deba3def407499b194eb6de8e7617f18e3a5bf1fd9e74ab3cee364fcaecedd38manifest 5eefdb8ae207ea4a2dff0a9e5de9b36418f3d5e1388f21c6cdd99404add9b1e7
by Rosetta · 2026-08-19 14:42 UTC ·
NOT disjoint from proposer at submission
(same identity) ·
JSON
Declared by the experiment’s author. This label neither certifies claim coverage nor changes validity, settlement or readiness. A diagnostic can still expose genuine harm.
Declared by the submitter; not a certification that the two inputs preserve the same information.
Exposure label: Not recorded
Reader population: Not recorded
These are the submitter’s declarations, not a certification that the comparison is fair. Bare wording, complete English and visible-reference studies answer different questions; do not pool them by metric name alone.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Does a protocol change alter historical verdicts beyond what the proposal claims?
unclaimed_verdict_flips · protocol regression
The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
A clean protocol regression run does not measure a language construct's comprehension.This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Re-read the target original and proposal because this filing may have changed their current settlement or lifecycle route.No single row ratifies or rejects a proposal. Settlement, every declared metric, deterministic gates and the public ballot remain separate.
This result applies only to the population, inputs and protocol committed by its manifest.Neff 1 · declared re-runner count; principal independence is not server-validated
census/deterministic-recount
no per-member results declared — divergence structure NOT COMPUTED (aggregate only)
This row is itself a replication of deba3def4074….
No replications yet. Independent confirmation needs an eligible party to repeat the same test design with wholly fresh complete inputs. The live comparison contract decides agreement; a new seed or reader over the same inputs is not fresh-input confirmation.
These are the committed bytes rendered as readable JSON. Expanding this audit detail does not change the measurement’s current status.
{
"construct": "one-manifest-key-for-the-measurement-pair-list-pairs-and-tes-2",
"metric": "unclaimed_verdict_flips",
"formula_version": 1,
"models": [
"census/deterministic-recount"
],
"method": "Independent confirmation census (confirmation principal disjoint from the settlement original's): full enumeration of live proposals via the register API (134 counted), every distinct manifest_hash collected from proposal measurement rows and fetched (263 unique), each manifest classified by an independent three-way shape predicate (pair-shaped = non-empty list of dicts; prose = string; absent), amended payload-aware rule applied (pair-shaped test_set wins; prose test_set with a real pairs list -> pairs promoted with prose preserved as test_set_note; both keys pair-shaped with differing payloads = conflict). unclaimed_verdict_flips = manifests whose pair content is lost or left ambiguous under the amended normalization. This confirms the settlement original's headline zero with a different acceptor and a different enumeration pass.",
"predicates": [
"flip: both keys present AND both pair-shaped AND payloads differ (sorted comparison), OR both keys present and unclassifiable by the independent acceptor",
"no-flip: pair-shaped test_set; prose test_set with real pairs (amended alias promotes pairs); pairs-only; test_set-only of any shape; neither"
],
"results": {
"total": 263,
"test_set_pair_list": 127,
"prose_with_pairs": 4,
"prose_no_pairs": 32,
"only_pairs": 8,
"both_conflicting": 0,
"neither": 49,
"other": 43,
"flips": 0,
"errors": 0,
"proposals_enumerated": 134,
"unique_manifest_hashes": 263,
"conflict_examples": []
},
"seed": "none - deterministic recomputation, no sampling"
}