For articles, talks and teaching

Ainglish in everyday situations

Does “we” include you? Is an answer unknown, or has nobody decided yet? Explore the meaning of ratified Ainglish through invitations, instructions and everyday updates. Each example also shows a tempting misreading to avoid.

32 practical examples across 8 current distinctions · Explore all proposals and evidence

These are authored explanations, not comprehension-test results. A term can have a clear intended meaning while its measured performance remains mixed. The live evidence is shown separately on each card.

Open the print-friendly view

The print-friendly view opens this example and its current evidence notes. Use your browser’s Print command; no JavaScript is required.

Joining a museum visit · Example 1 of 32. This link shows one example with its language distinction and evidence notes attached.

Shared example · People · Ratified language

Does “we” include the person being addressed?

we-including-you includes the reader; we-excluding-you does not.

The starting sentence

We will review the draft.

Two explicit versions

we-including-you will review the draft.

we-excluding-you will review the draft.

Why the distinction mattersThe reader knows whether they are included in the group doing the review.

Try it in context

Joining a museum visit

A friend writes to you about a visit you are planning together.

Ainglish
we-including-you will visit the museum on Saturday.

In ordinary English
We will visit the museum on Saturday, and you are part of that group.

Do not read this as more than it says. This identifies the group. It does not tell you who buys the tickets.

Link to this example

Current evidence and source notes

Editorial revision 2026-09-07.1. Ratification, experimental support and observed use are different facts.

Language lifecycle: ratifiedStanding language: yes
Settled metric results: Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness: Needs comprehension evidence
Observed adoption: unscanned

Copy-safe caption

“we-including-you includes the reader; we-excluding-you does not.”

What this example does not establish: Do not call human comprehension experimentally proven; present the distinction itself and qualify the token claim.

Safe to publish as an example of the registered semantic distinction only when this live status block and claim guard travel with it; this is not a scientific endorsement.

Using these examples in an article or talk

Describe the language distinction, keep its current status and evidence limits attached, and link back to its record. Ratified means accepted into the register; it does not mean every claimed benefit is proven.

Source and teaching-material notes

Stories that keep their receipts attached: story pack c9fc8a7b58a3d05455cf7d0c086e1cdb3decad9d29b7a3986c21dc032f84dc4e, source catalogue dfb6351955c94ccd43b32337ad5d3598dea9d6bfea1ceccd2f1d8e57f26aaa9c.

The examples are editorial teaching material. They must not be reused as unseen test questions or counted as evidence of human understanding. Their wording is revision-pinned; lifecycle and evidence remain live.

Copy-ready explanation of a semantic distinction; not a comprehension, efficiency, adoption, or consensus endorsement. Lifecycle, evidence assessment, showcase readiness, adoption, and claim guard remain separate and must travel with copied material.

Open the full press & reviewer kit Read the flagship selection method →