Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

For articles, talks and teaching

Ainglish in everyday situations

Does “we” include you? Is an answer unknown, or has nobody decided yet? Explore the meaning of ratified Ainglish through invitations, instructions and everyday updates. Each example also shows a tempting misreading to avoid.

32 practical examples across 8 current distinctions · Explore all proposals and evidence

These are authored explanations, not comprehension-test results. A term can have a clear intended meaning while its measured performance remains mixed. The live evidence is shown separately on each card.

Return to the compact view

The print-friendly view opens this example and its current evidence notes. Use your browser’s Print command; no JavaScript is required.

Two journeys, one comparison · Example 31 of 32. This link shows one example with its language distinction and evidence notes attached.

Shared example · Comparisons · Ratified language

Which baseline does a reported change actually compare against?

vs names the baseline behind a delta instead of leaving the comparison implicit.

The starting sentence
Latency changed by −12 ms.
Two explicit versions

latency Δ−12ms vs(release-0.49).

latency Δ−12ms vs(previous-hour).

Why the distinction mattersA reader can identify the named comparison instead of silently choosing another baseline. Reproducing the number still requires the underlying data and method.

Try it in context

Two journeys, one comparison

Illustrative journey times: the direct bus took 35 minutes; the walking route took 50 minutes.

Ainglish
Journey time was 15 minutes shorter vs(the walking route).

In ordinary English
The bus journey was 15 minutes shorter than the walking journey.

Do not read this as more than it says. The baseline is a different route, not last week’s bus. This does not say which route will be quicker tomorrow.

Link to this example

Current evidence and source notes

Editorial revision 2026-09-07.2. Ratification, experimental support and observed use are different facts.

Language lifecycle
ratifiedStanding language: yes
Settled metric results
Token cost: lower · Comprehension accuracy: no settled result
Showcase readiness
Needs comprehension evidence
Observed adoption
unscanned

Copy-safe caption

“vs names the baseline behind a delta instead of leaving the comparison implicit.”

What this example does not establish: Do not imply the marker proves that the named baseline exists or is appropriate, or that the notation is typo-proof. Its declared one-edit `vs(` → `vs` alias-class neighbour loses explicit binding while leaving the baseline text visibly present.

Safe to publish as an example of the registered semantic distinction only when this live status block and claim guard travel with it; this is not a scientific endorsement.

Using these examples in an article or talk

Describe the language distinction, keep its current status and evidence limits attached, and link back to its record. Ratified means accepted into the register; it does not mean every claimed benefit is proven.

Source and teaching-material notes

Stories that keep their receipts attached: story pack c9fc8a7b58a3d05455cf7d0c086e1cdb3decad9d29b7a3986c21dc032f84dc4e, source catalogue dfb6351955c94ccd43b32337ad5d3598dea9d6bfea1ceccd2f1d8e57f26aaa9c.

The examples are editorial teaching material. They must not be reused as unseen test questions or counted as evidence of human understanding. Their wording is revision-pinned; lifecycle and evidence remain live.

Copy-ready explanation of a semantic distinction; not a comprehension, efficiency, adoption, or consensus endorsement. Lifecycle, evidence assessment, showcase readiness, adoption, and claim guard remain separate and must travel with copied material.

Open the full press & reviewer kit Read the flagship selection method →