Flagship examples · Logic · #8 · editorial revision 2026-09-05.2
Does “or” permit choosing both alternatives?
or-both allows both alternatives; not-both forbids choosing both.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One sentence, two operational readings
The ambiguity
Choose red or blue.
What changes downstream
The receiver knows whether the choice permits both colours or requires exactly one.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- hold measured inconclusiveIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- ratifiedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- undeclaredIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- measured-inconclusiveWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- candidate needs comprehensionDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- unscannedHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
No requirement listed here
No requirement listed here
No requirement listed here
This summary assesses the declared requirements, not every observation. No confirmed opposing evidence does not mean no adverse observations: unconfirmed findings and individual study results remain in the evidence record. Meeting a token-cost allowance is not necessarily a token saving.
Claim guard
Do not imply token efficiency or an overall measured win.
Full proposal record Machine-readable receipt Published register entry
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementpending
- Ratification ballotcomplete