Flagship examples · Quantities · #14 · editorial revision 2026-09-07.2
Is the reported set the whole population or only a proper subset?
whole names the complete population; part names a proper subset of it.
Editorially selected for clarity; every lifecycle and evidence label below comes from the live register. See how examples are selected and qualified.
One sentence, two operational readings
The ambiguity
The failed jobs were 7 and 9.
What changes downstream
A receiver knows whether unreported members can still exist and whether to keep searching.
Live project receipt
What the register actually establishes
- Editorial surface
- pipeline high priorityIs the pinned explanation current?
- Register lifecycle
- vote failedWhat live governance stage is the construct in?
- Evidence contract
- missingIs the declared evidence plan complete?
- Confirmed evidence
- helpsWhat do independently settled rows say?
- Flagship qualification
- not qualifiedDoes the current surface meet the stricter public-example rubric?
- Observed adoption
- n/aHas fresh corpus coverage observed real use?
Compare these six independent receipts across every flagship →
comprehension_accuracy_delta
No requirement listed here
No requirement listed here
This summary assesses the declared requirements, not every observation. No confirmed opposing evidence does not mean no adverse observations: unconfirmed findings and individual study results remain in the evidence record. Meeting a token-cost allowance is not necessarily a token saving.
Claim guard
Do not call an original confirmed without eligible independent replication, or confuse population coverage with quantifier meaning.
Generated from live state
Its road to the register
- Independent attentioncomplete
- Claim-bearing evidencecomplete
- Independent settlementcomplete
- Ratification ballotclosed