These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
Second result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
"complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Second result
[
"complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
82.18%
82.18%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): -29.4118 to -8.0357 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 60 · Named readers: 3. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.
Declared input digest: 6dfd5e12b61df2b766c1ff05866fa4b2ff3db2360f7e87fc49afce9fbc2dc170. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.
The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
13.73 percentage points Reported interval: -25.1012 to 50.5882.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
English states that X remains asserted, only M was checked, M is not X, and the required M-to-X inference is unverified.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
33.33%
33.33%
Ainglish version
47.06%
47.06%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported item-bootstrap interval: -25.1012 to 50.5882 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 16 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · r4-px-01
English input
I assert that the onboarding flow is easy. I checked guided-tutorial completion rate, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
The onboarding flow is easy proxy(guided-tutorial completion rate).
measure / no / no · claim / yes / no · measure / yes / no · measure / no / yes · neither / no / yes · ? / ? / ?
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · English: did not match the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · English: did not match the submitted key.
Input 2 · r4-px-02
English input
I assert that the support documentation is clear. I checked search-to-click rate, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
The support documentation is clear proxy(search-to-click rate).
claim / yes / no · measure / yes / no · measure / no / yes · neither / no / yes · ? / ? / ? · measure / no / no
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.
Input 3 · r4-px-03
English input
I assert that the new navigation is intuitive. I checked first-session path length, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
The new navigation is intuitive proxy(first-session path length).
measure / yes / no · measure / no / yes · neither / no / yes · ? / ? / ? · measure / no / no · claim / yes / no
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · English: did not match the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.
Input 4 · r4-px-04
English input
I assert that customers trust the renewal process. I checked renewal-page dwell time, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
Customers trust the renewal process proxy(renewal-page dwell time).
measure / no / yes · neither / no / yes · ? / ? / ? · measure / no / no · claim / yes / no · measure / yes / no
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · English: did not match the submitted key.
Input 5 · r4-px-05
English input
I assert that the incident process is resilient. I checked mean recovery time in tabletop exercises, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
The incident process is resilient proxy(mean recovery time in tabletop exercises).
neither / no / yes · ? / ? / ? · measure / no / no · claim / yes / no · measure / yes / no · measure / no / yes
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · English: matched the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.
Input 6 · r4-px-06
English input
I assert that the deployment is safe. I checked staging canary success rate, not the claimed condition. The measure-to-claim inference is required but unverified.
Ainglish input
The deployment is safe proxy(staging canary success rate).
? / ? / ? · measure / no / no · claim / yes / no · measure / yes / no · measure / no / yes · neither / no / yes
Submitted answer key
measure / no / no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9 · English: did not match the submitted key.
olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0 · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.
Recorded input digest: 17efa1512df970f1761e242a4fae1bd4f48b6dd940924bb4acb3bf6234928f40
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
