These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
Second result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
"complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Second result
[
"complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
First result
[
"solar-pro4@provider-served"
]
Second result
[
"spark-zen-13-minimal"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 12.5 percentage points
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
12.5 percentage points Reported interval: -6.25 to 30.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Complete careful-English expansion.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
solar-pro4@provider-served
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
81.25%
81.25%
Ainglish version
93.75%
93.75%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported item-bootstrap interval: -6.25 to 30 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 48 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.
Declared input digest: 95efd2fc504fd4225a0f05f9ca6bdb3593ed4f05f3247afe961155546f5c5419. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.
The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
12.99 percentage points Reported interval: -25 to 48.0519.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Complete careful-English expansion.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
72.73%
72.73%
Ainglish version
85.71%
85.71%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported item-bootstrap interval: -25 to 48.0519 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 18 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 18 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 6 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 7 · anchored-deploy-pipeline-miss
English input
The release log noted the oversight during the deploy pipeline. A release captain owned the gate, and the canary analysis was accidentally missing from the record. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the review arrangement.
Ainglish input
The release log noted the overslip during the deploy pipeline. A release captain owned the gate, and the canary analysis was accidentally missing from the record. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the review arrangement.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
a deliberate skip · watchful supervision · cannot tell · an accidental miss
Submitted answer key
an accidental miss. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.
Input 8 · anchored-deploy-pipeline-supervision
English input
The release log noted the oversight during the deploy pipeline. A release captain owned the gate, and the canary analysis was accidentally missing from the record. The cited role was the review arrangement, not the unnoticed absence.
Ainglish input
The release log noted the oversight during the deploy pipeline. A release captain owned the gate, and the canary analysis was accidentally missing from the record. The cited role was the review arrangement, not the unnoticed absence.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
an accidental miss · a deliberate skip · watchful supervision · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
watchful supervision. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.
Input 9 · anchored-access-review-miss
English input
The compliance file recorded the oversight during the access review. An auditor owned the checklist, and one contractor account was accidentally left active. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the review arrangement.
Ainglish input
The compliance file recorded the overslip during the access review. An auditor owned the checklist, and one contractor account was accidentally left active. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the review arrangement.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
an accidental miss · a deliberate skip · watchful supervision · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
an accidental miss. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.
Input 10 · anchored-access-review-supervision
English input
The compliance file recorded the oversight during the access review. An auditor owned the checklist, and one contractor account was accidentally left active. The cited role was the review arrangement, not the unnoticed absence.
Ainglish input
The compliance file recorded the oversight during the access review. An auditor owned the checklist, and one contractor account was accidentally left active. The cited role was the review arrangement, not the unnoticed absence.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
watchful supervision · cannot tell · an accidental miss · a deliberate skip
Submitted answer key
watchful supervision. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.
Input 11 · anchored-backup-restore-miss
English input
The operations diary described the oversight of the backup restore. The night operator ran the drill, and one archive volume was accidentally skipped. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the operating procedure.
Ainglish input
The operations diary described the overslip of the backup restore. The night operator ran the drill, and one archive volume was accidentally skipped. The cited problem was the unnoticed absence, not the operating procedure.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
an accidental miss · a deliberate skip · watchful supervision · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
an accidental miss. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.
Input 12 · anchored-backup-restore-supervision
English input
The operations diary described the oversight of the backup restore. The night operator ran the drill, and one archive volume was accidentally skipped. The cited role was the operating procedure, not the unnoticed absence.
Ainglish input
The operations diary described the oversight of the backup restore. The night operator ran the drill, and one archive volume was accidentally skipped. The cited role was the operating procedure, not the unnoticed absence.
Question
What kind of event or role does the report's focal phrase describe?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell · an accidental miss · a deliberate skip · watchful supervision
Submitted answer key
watchful supervision. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.
spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.
Recorded input digest: 59e47a5df9b0c9f4ef4f3f519d47cdc3c538a556cbe5b52145c9171a0f9d3c7e
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
