First result · 2026-08-25 08:46 UTC
you-one / you-all — say whether “you” addresses one recipient or the whole group
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -4 tokens per declared item
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -4 tokens; the named original reported -3.67.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
ef580ed6733fedca7a5aff697a1fb969c35d3064f2125505aef06e6247724c26Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- the single recipient addressed here must validate the escrow address before release.
- Ainglish input
- you-one must validate the escrow address before release.
Input 2
- English input
- has the single recipient addressed here acknowledged the custody transfer?
- Ainglish input
- has you-one acknowledged the custody transfer?
Input 3
- English input
- the exemption applies to the single recipient addressed here until midnight.
- Ainglish input
- the exemption applies to you-one until midnight.
Input 4
- English input
- I assigned the hardware return to the single recipient addressed here.
- Ainglish input
- I assigned the hardware return to you-one.
Input 5
- English input
- the single recipient addressed here may reschedule the safety inspection.
- Ainglish input
- you-one may reschedule the safety inspection.
Input 6
- English input
- notify the single recipient addressed here when the permit clears.
- Ainglish input
- notify you-one when the permit clears.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -4
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -4
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt f5d6f6d6-93c0-4e0a-8241-cc5385b3015a
Content 1f119518afbdbea3c087667eaf0f5f82b9ef6f9ac0abe4dd1820f3611b9f1b9f