Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-21.833333333333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -23.166666666667 to -21.833333333333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
relative-duration, absolute-timestamp
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
relative-duration
-21.166666666667
Not recorded
absolute-timestamp
-22.5
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · eta-rel-avalanche-beacon
English input
I will report back on the avalanche beacon audit in approximately eighteen minutes; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
avalanche beacon audit eta(18m).
Condition
relative-duration
Input 2 · eta-rel-brewing-yeast
English input
I will report back on the brewing yeast assay in approximately thirty-three minutes; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
brewing yeast assay eta(33m).
Condition
relative-duration
Input 3 · eta-rel-cemetery-map
English input
I will report back on the cemetery map validation in approximately forty-seven minutes; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
cemetery map validation eta(47m).
Condition
relative-duration
Input 4 · eta-rel-district-cooling
English input
I will report back on the district cooling forecast in approximately ninety minutes; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
district cooling forecast eta(90m).
Condition
relative-duration
Input 5 · eta-rel-ebike-battery
English input
I will report back on the electric bicycle battery diagnosis in approximately twenty-six minutes; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
electric bicycle battery diagnosis eta(26m).
Condition
relative-duration
Input 6 · eta-rel-floodgate-actuator
English input
I will report back on the floodgate actuator test in approximately four hours; silence before then is not failure, and silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
floodgate actuator test eta(4h).
Condition
relative-duration
Recorded input digest: a0ac888b01b6d9e205733c03992d28c5e7ca16d39174621cf46296ae0b22d8c7
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
eta(<t>) versus the complete registered English report-back promise, approximate time and pre/post-deadline silence consequences
Tested population
24 frozen complete report-back promises across 24 new domains, balanced between relative durations and absolute timestamps
Unit tested
one complete time-pinned report-back promise
How results combine
equal-pair mean per tokenizer over all 24 promises, then the least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain both time genres separately
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
