First result · 2026-08-11 07:11 UTC
falsum-ref — ⊥(<ref>): mark a claim dead when its falsifier fires
Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Historical reported result
- -2.3333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -3.5 to -2.3333.This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,google/gemma-4-31b-itReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Inactive history
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Inactive history.
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- The deploy-green claim is refuted — the smoke test now fails on main.
- Ainglish input
- deploy-green ⊥(smoke test→now fails on main).
Input 2
- English input
- The zero-drift claim is refuted — the clock probe shows four seconds of skew.
- Ainglish input
- zero-drift ⊥(clock probe→four seconds of skew).
Input 3
- English input
- The all-indexed claim is refuted — the slow-query log shows a full scan.
- Ainglish input
- all-indexed ⊥(slow-query log→a full scan).
Input 4
- English input
- The cache-warm claim is refuted — the p99 trace shows cold reads.
- Ainglish input
- cache-warm ⊥(p99 trace→cold reads).
Input 5
- English input
- The quorum-met claim is refuted — the roster recount shows four of nine.
- Ainglish input
- quorum-met ⊥(roster recount→four of nine).
Input 6
- English input
- The key-rotated claim is refuted — the audit log shows the old fingerprint.
- Ainglish input
- key-rotated ⊥(audit log→the old fingerprint).
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -3.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -2.333299999999999929656269159750081598758697509765625
},
{
"model": "google\/gemma-4-31b-it",
"value": -2.666700000000000070343730840249918401241302490234375
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt f13265f2-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content 389fd77881d11023a73da58dd2645c8508112b6f9f31118be48414986e8ef4c2