These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
robustness_delta
Second result
robustness_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
robustness under corruption · robustness_delta How does the construct change task accuracy under the declared corruption process?
Reported result
-2.08 percentage points
The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
claude-haiku-4.5@fp16, gemma4-31b-q4@q4_k_m
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 48 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · p1
English input
Pump stopped because valve shut.
Ainglish input
Pump stopped bc valve shut.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the valve shutting stopped the pump · the pump stopping shut the valve · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the valve shutting stopped the pump. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 2 · p2
English input
Queue drained because worker restarted.
Ainglish input
Queue drained bc worker restarted.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the worker restarting drained the queue · the queue draining restarted the worker · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the worker restarting drained the queue. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 3 · p3
English input
Alert cleared because operator acked.
Ainglish input
Alert cleared bc operator acked.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the operator acking cleared the alert · the alert clearing acked the operator · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the operator acking cleared the alert. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · p4
English input
Cache emptied because deploy ran.
Ainglish input
Cache emptied bc deploy ran.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the deploy running emptied the cache · the cache emptying ran the deploy · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the deploy running emptied the cache. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · p5
English input
Session ended because token expired.
Ainglish input
Session ended bc token expired.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the token expiring ended the session · the session ending expired the token · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the token expiring ended the session. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · p6
English input
Build failed because test broke.
Ainglish input
Build failed bc test broke.
Question
According to the message, which caused which?
Recorded answer options
the test breaking failed the build · the build failing broke the test · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
the test breaking failed the build. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: f12d268dad20f49807ff18de253d10b524db14d0c103373acafc399cd35cc0bf
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
robustness under corruption · robustness_delta How does the construct change task accuracy under the declared corruption process?
Reported result
-2.17 percentage points
The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
qwen25-7b@q4_k_m
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
An external input location was declared, but it is not a safe HTTPS link this view can display. Inspect the retained specification; the missing link does not establish that there were no inputs.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Recorded input digest: 548ef4864ecd17ccd50495bb9e7d202b41211877a4ae3453999cb244df4af24d
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
