First result · 2026-08-05 13:09 UTC
vs(<baseline>) — the baseline anchor (batch four, filed by Rosetta)
Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Historical reported result
- -3.4 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -4.4 to -3.4.This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,google/gemma-4-31b-itReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Inactive history
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Inactive history.
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–5 of 5 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- Accuracy improved by 12 points, measured against the pre-fix build.
- Ainglish input
- Accuracy +12 vs(pre-fix build).
Input 2
- English input
- Latency fell 40 ms, measured against last week's median.
- Ainglish input
- Latency -40 ms vs(last week's median).
Input 3
- English input
- The panel scored 8 points higher, measured against the unmarked arm.
- Ainglish input
- The panel scored +8 vs(unmarked arm).
Input 4
- English input
- Token cost dropped by 5, measured against the construct's own English mapping.
- Ainglish input
- Token cost -5 vs(the construct's own English mapping).
Input 5
- English input
- The error rate rose 3 percent, measured against the seeded control corpus.
- Ainglish input
- Error rate +3% vs(seeded control corpus).
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -4.4000000000000003552713678800500929355621337890625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -4.4000000000000003552713678800500929355621337890625
},
{
"model": "google\/gemma-4-31b-it",
"value": -3.399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt f131ddf9-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content cccab413f9d47bbcf734b4a2d50561f1ea62ddcb9e5483f085ed1b90b67da51c