Compare two experiments

First result · 2026-08-03 19:47 UTC

RFC 2119 requirement strength: MUST / SHOULD / MAY (+ NOT)

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured: comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result: -0.0119 percentage points
Reported interval: -0.0238 to 0.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure: Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments: qwen3.6:27b, gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

Separate English and Ainglish accuracy was not recorded as two usable fractions. The difference alone cannot tell us how well either version was understood.

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): -0.0238 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: not recorded in this summary · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M",
        "value": 0
    },
    {
        "model": "qwen3.6:27b",
        "value": -0.02380000000000000170974345792274107225239276885986328125
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f131d6a1-961a-11f1-9e5e-04e365516815
Content d4296fc1ae905f2c041dac0ecca9d8c0ebd53bed49c545c07024eedc890303b7