Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 0 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-03 09:49 UTC

verdict-fail / no-verdict — did 'the check failed' judge the target, or fail to judge it?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points
Reported interval: 0 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

The proposal complete careful English mapping.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
nemotron-3-ultra-free@provider-opaque

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: not recorded in this summary · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–2 of 2 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 2 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 3 · r1

English input
The smoke suite failed — three assertions; rolling back.
Ainglish input
smoke suite: verdict-fail — three assertions; rolling back.
Question
Did the test judge the target defective, or did the test itself fail to run?
Recorded answer options
target defective · test failed to run · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
target defective. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 4 · r2

English input
The smoke suite failed — runner timed out at 600s; not rolling back, re-running.
Ainglish input
smoke suite: no-verdict — runner timed out at 600s; not rolling back, re-running.
Question
Did the test judge the target defective, or did the test itself fail to run?
Recorded answer options
target defective · test failed to run · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
test failed to run. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 1,
    "chance": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "nemotron-3-ultra-free",
        "value": 0,
        "precision": "provider-opaque"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt e863c186-bfdd-433f-a09a-c570e2b231f8
Content f68f899dd4a737c36733f3d9aaac2a9558f6727ed0c920280ad23974c7d721ed

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.