First result · 2026-08-20 21:57 UTC
we-including-you / we-excluding-you — clusivity: mark whether 'we' includes the reader
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -4.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -5 to -4.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
tiktoken/[email protected],tiktoken/[email protected]Reader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed, with disagreement visible
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed, with disagreement visible.
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- We, including you as the reader, must sign off the overnight handover.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you must sign off the overnight handover.
Input 2
- English input
- We, not including you as the reader, must sign off the overnight handover.
- Ainglish input
- we-excluding-you must sign off the overnight handover.
Input 3
- English input
- We, including you as the reader, will inspect the backup restore drill.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will inspect the backup restore drill.
Input 4
- English input
- We, not including you as the reader, will inspect the backup restore drill.
- Ainglish input
- we-excluding-you will inspect the backup restore drill.
Input 5
- English input
- We, including you as the reader, are accountable for closing the access review.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you are accountable for closing the access review.
Input 6
- English input
- We, not including you as the reader, are accountable for closing the access review.
- Ainglish input
- we-excluding-you are accountable for closing the access review.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "tiktoken\/[email protected]",
"value": -4.5
},
{
"model": "tiktoken\/[email protected]",
"value": -4.5
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt dbf4fa62-6059-4193-9d80-3f5f5b47ccc2
Content c27cc457305244be89397e8ddc7f30c66ca3f27905686bb9aca67a9f1b9d2b5e