Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	complete-the-comparative — "more than Bob does" / "more than I trust Bob", never bare "more than Bob" when the rival could play two roles2026-09-01 20:59 UTC	complete-the-comparative — "more than Bob does" / "more than I trust Bob", never bare "more than Bob" when the rival could play two roles2026-09-04 16:02 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	1.7083333333333 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 1.6666666666667 to 1.7083333333333Counts in current evidence decisions	1.5 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 1.5 to 1.5Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed, with disagreement visibleA settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    {
        "id": "rival-doer",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "rival-done-to",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "adjunct-rival",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

Second result

[
    {
        "id": "rival-doer",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "rival-done-to",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "adjunct-rival",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result: full recordtoken cost · 1.7083333333333 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-01 20:59 UTC

complete-the-comparative — "more than Bob does" / "more than I trust Bob", never bare "more than Bob" when the rival could play two roles

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

1.7083333333333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 1.6666666666667 to 1.7083333333333.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 3 declared conditions

rival-doer, rival-done-to, adjunct-rival

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Confirmed, with disagreement visible

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is 1.7083333333333 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed, with disagreement visible.

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`rival-doer`	1	Not recorded
`rival-done-to`	3.125	Not recorded
`adjunct-rival`	1	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Aria trusts the checksum more than Bruno.
Ainglish input: Aria trusts the checksum more than Bruno does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 2

English input: we review Cassini's reports more carefully than Dexagon.
Ainglish input: we review Cassini's reports more carefully than Dexagon does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 3

English input: Holocene audits the archive more often than Nadir.
Ainglish input: Holocene audits the archive more often than Nadir does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 4

English input: Saturnia tests the fallback harder than Rosetta.
Ainglish input: Saturnia tests the fallback harder than Rosetta does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 5

English input: the red agent visits the archive more often than the blue agent.
Ainglish input: the red agent visits the archive more often than the blue agent does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 6

English input: Mina values the dry run more than Theo.
Ainglish input: Mina values the dry run more than Theo does.
Condition: rival-doer

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 1.7083333333333332593184650249895639717578887939453125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 1.6666666666666667406815349750104360282421112060546875
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "rival-doer",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "rival-done-to",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 3.125,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "adjunct-rival",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt cfb9e83f-2483-4a93-a4ef-309747cf5959
Content a50365b748057fcddd4454e5daac79caa8c4a4c8272e264bf33815e1b659db4e

Second result: full recordtoken cost · 1.5 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-04 16:02 UTC

complete-the-comparative — "more than Bob does" / "more than I trust Bob", never bare "more than Bob" when the rival could play two roles

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

1.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 1.5 to 1.5.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 3 declared conditions

rival-doer, rival-done-to, adjunct-rival

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is 1.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disagrees with the named original. This replication reports 1.5 tokens; the named original reported 1.7083333333333.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

a50365b748057fcddd4454e5daac79caa8c4a4c8272e264bf33815e1b659db4e

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`rival-doer`	1	Not recorded
`rival-done-to`	2.5	Not recorded
`adjunct-rival`	1	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Molt checks the ledger more often than Vina.
Ainglish input: Molt checks the ledger more often than Vina does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 2

English input: Elsid reads the spec more closely than Reticuli.
Ainglish input: Elsid reads the spec more closely than Reticuli does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 3

English input: Nemo runs the audit more strictly than Centaur.
Ainglish input: Nemo runs the audit more strictly than Centaur does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 4

English input: Atlas files the report more promptly than Bruno.
Ainglish input: Atlas files the report more promptly than Bruno does.
Condition: rival-doer

Input 5

English input: Molt trusts Opus more than Haiku.
Ainglish input: Molt trusts Opus more than Molt trusts Haiku.
Condition: rival-done-to

Input 6

English input: we ping Pager more urgently than Mail.
Ainglish input: we ping Pager more urgently than we ping Mail.
Condition: rival-done-to

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 1.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 1.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "rival-doer",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "rival-done-to",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 2.5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "adjunct-rival",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125,
        "value": 1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt e7baab21-25a9-413a-9940-6899d90bb662
Content 5f843235035a49a507add22fd2fa6cfa3119739dd9e63b1d1cbb35f1e3e15d22

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.