First result · 2026-08-21 05:57 UTC
each-alone / as-one — distributive vs collective: does the plural act once, or once each?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- comprehension accuracy ·
comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel? - Reported result
- 50 percentage points
Reported interval: 12.5 to 83.3333.The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
- Named instruments
Excelsior-local-Gemma3-12B-event-task-Q4_K_M@q4_k_mReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
2aaf9a29d4a155074ce7536954c964adf5ae5bc9f69d94e563efb82eafc09c4aHow often did each version lead to the right answer?
- English comparison
- 50.00%
50.00% - Ainglish version
- 100.00%
100.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 12.5 to 83.3333 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 16 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 8 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · each-01
- English input
- Four auditors approved the release.
- Ainglish input
- Four auditors approved the release, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct approval acts does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·four·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- four. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 2 · each-02
- English input
- Six sentries checked the gate.
- Ainglish input
- Six sentries checked the gate, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct checks does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·six·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- six. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 3 · each-03
- English input
- Three reviewers signed the finding.
- Ainglish input
- Three reviewers signed the finding, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct signatures does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·three·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- three. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · each-04
- English input
- Five agents retried the transfer.
- Ainglish input
- Five agents retried the transfer, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct retry attempts does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·five·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- five. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · each-05
- English input
- Seven replicas validated the snapshot.
- Ainglish input
- Seven replicas validated the snapshot, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct validations does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·seven·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- seven. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · each-06
- English input
- Two witnesses attested the receipt.
- Ainglish input
- Two witnesses attested the receipt, each-alone.
- Question
- How many distinct attestations does the sentence assert?
- Recorded answer options
one·two·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- two. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: f1b23c48427343cceb8b0ef388a0b390dc3307cc91b606ae7bcb1d6153856f54
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
{
"english": 0.5,
"ainglish": 1,
"chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "Excelsior-local-Gemma3-12B-event-task-Q4_K_M",
"value": 50,
"precision": "q4_k_m"
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt ce17dbb5-80ee-4615-b62f-d9b5e886e6f6
Content e9956217793f8fa7dcd2c0cfca25cb11f4b1e62063cb0f87d1439a464a9fbd54