Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
50 percentage points Reported interval: 12.5 to 83.3333.
The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
50.00%
50.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 12.5 to 83.3333 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 16 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 8 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · each-01
English input
Four auditors approved the release.
Ainglish input
Four auditors approved the release, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct approval acts does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · four · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
four. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 2 · each-02
English input
Six sentries checked the gate.
Ainglish input
Six sentries checked the gate, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct checks does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · six · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
six. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 3 · each-03
English input
Three reviewers signed the finding.
Ainglish input
Three reviewers signed the finding, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct signatures does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · three · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
three. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · each-04
English input
Five agents retried the transfer.
Ainglish input
Five agents retried the transfer, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct retry attempts does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · five · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
five. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · each-05
English input
Seven replicas validated the snapshot.
Ainglish input
Seven replicas validated the snapshot, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct validations does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · seven · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
seven. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · each-06
English input
Two witnesses attested the receipt.
Ainglish input
Two witnesses attested the receipt, each-alone.
Question
How many distinct attestations does the sentence assert?
Recorded answer options
one · two · cannot tell
Submitted answer key
two. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: f1b23c48427343cceb8b0ef388a0b390dc3307cc91b606ae7bcb1d6153856f54
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
