First result · 2026-09-30 20:09 UTC
well-formed-under / admissible-under — did ‘valid’ mean the right shape, or allowed by the rules?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 1.125 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -0.265625 to 1.125.More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
well-formed-under,admissible-underAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is 1.125 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports 1.125 tokens; the named original reported 0.75.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
- 0 of 128 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
- 0 of 128 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
13706318ad78f9e97a23e66157e52d4e44a153c27d60077127e70b8e53facbc5Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
well-formed-under | -0.375 | Not recorded |
admissible-under | 2.625 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 128 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · wf-sat-701
- English input
- TideLookup-701 parses and satisfies TideLookup-schema-v2's structural rules.
- Ainglish input
- TideLookup-701 well-formed-under(TideLookup-schema-v2).
- Condition
- well-formed-under
Input 2 · ad-sat-701
- English input
- TideLookup-policy-v3 permits TideLookup-701 to proceed.
- Ainglish input
- TideLookup-701 admissible-under(TideLookup-policy-v3).
- Condition
- admissible-under
Input 3 · wf-sat-702
- English input
- OrchardRoute-702 parses and satisfies OrchardRoute-schema-v2's structural rules.
- Ainglish input
- OrchardRoute-702 well-formed-under(OrchardRoute-schema-v2).
- Condition
- well-formed-under
Input 4 · ad-sat-702
- English input
- OrchardRoute-policy-v3 permits OrchardRoute-702 to proceed.
- Ainglish input
- OrchardRoute-702 admissible-under(OrchardRoute-policy-v3).
- Condition
- admissible-under
Input 5 · wf-sat-703
- English input
- BeaconStatus-703 parses and satisfies BeaconStatus-schema-v2's structural rules.
- Ainglish input
- BeaconStatus-703 well-formed-under(BeaconStatus-schema-v2).
- Condition
- well-formed-under
Input 6 · ad-sat-703
- English input
- BeaconStatus-policy-v3 permits BeaconStatus-703 to proceed.
- Ainglish input
- BeaconStatus-703 admissible-under(BeaconStatus-policy-v3).
- Condition
- admissible-under
Recorded input digest: f443f89674347da3f3d69613c401a930fe2c9c22200c29364fe4ec725e5edafe
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Marked wording minus concise complete English: X parses and satisfies S's structural rules; P permits X to proceed. Both sides refer to the same immutable item, versioned rule and single stated gate; neither implies truth, safety, issuer authority or successful execution.
- Tested population
- 128 authored messages: 64 structural-conformance statements and 64 policy-admission statements, eight per form in each of eight equally weighted domains (API, configuration, data import, ballots, grant applications, moderation, deployment, procurement). One fixed renderer per form; not a random natural-usage population.
- Unit tested
- One complete affirmative structural-conformance or policy-admission message with identical item and named rule references.
- How results combine
- Equal item means within each of two equally weighted predicate strata, then maximum tokenizer mean over the three declared encodings. Report both form strata and retain the complete form-by-tokenizer matrix; domain variation is diagnostic.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -0.265625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": 0.1875
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 1.125
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "well-formed-under",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -0.375,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "admissible-under",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": 2.625,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt c9f15148-67bf-4029-a5d6-5618e18c3d69
Content effef516837f8511c248664858d929bb2244de84ece2fca04fa678850578ed38