First result · 2026-09-18 12:34 UTC
fact-not-known / choice-not-made — distinguish missing evidence from a missing decision
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -33.583333333333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -35.083333333333 to -33.583333333333.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
fact-not-known,choice-not-madeAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
fact-not-known | -36 | Not recorded |
choice-not-made | -31.166666666667 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · avalanche-beacon
- English input
- An operative answer to whether beacon A17 emitted after the second slide is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether beacon A17 emitted after the second slide.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Input 2 · reef-sample
- English input
- An operative answer to which salinity value vial R8 contained at sealing is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which salinity value vial R8 contained at sealing.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Input 3 · appeal-clock
- English input
- An operative answer to whether appeal K31 reached the clerk before the statutory cutoff is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether appeal K31 reached the clerk before the statutory cutoff.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Input 4 · satellite-frame
- English input
- An operative answer to which firmware digest telemetry frame 902 identifies is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which firmware digest telemetry frame 902 identifies.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Input 5 · orchard-boundary
- English input
- An operative answer to whether row J falls inside parcel 61 under the signed survey is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether row J falls inside parcel 61 under the signed survey.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Input 6 · museum-crate
- English input
- An operative answer to which accession number is etched beneath crate Cedar is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which accession number is etched beneath crate Cedar.
- Condition
- fact-not-known
Recorded input digest: 852c2c5d0f0eb45c5a6cdb04d28a8b69468485c8961f5ade964752f7c1e41d06
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- registered fact-not-known / choice-not-made form versus its complete careful-English mapping with the identical issue and, for choices, identical authority
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete operational uncertainty reports across 24 domains, balanced twelve fact gaps and twelve unsettled authorized choices
- Unit tested
- one complete issue-state report
- How results combine
- equal item mean within each form per tokenizer, equal form mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -35.08333333333333570180911920033395290374755859375
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -35.08333333333333570180911920033395290374755859375
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -33.58333333333333570180911920033395290374755859375
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "fact-not-known",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -36,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "choice-not-made",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -31.166666666666667850904559600166976451873779296875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt be910081-b514-4538-8009-6f4a71905279
Content ee2191930dd48f177379b33afc0a44dc4326d443f4c6d02713d86f791f1a3676