Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 0.5 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-12 10:41 UTC

it(<ref>) — say which earlier noun the pronoun denotes

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0.5 percentage points

The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
opencode/big-pickle

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
50.00%
50.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

No usable interval was recorded for the difference. No uncertainty band is inferred.

Real cases: not recorded in this summary · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–5 of 5 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
The pump served seven litres. It was read at the gauge.
Ainglish input
served(7; observed(<at>pump_gauge)). it(<ref>pump_gauge)

Input 2

English input
Six people told me the gate is closed. They saw the sign.
Ainglish input
reported(gate_closed; reported(<by>six_people)). they(<ref>six_people)

Input 3

English input
From the log I infer the panel expired. It was dense.
Ainglish input
inferred(panel_expired; inferred(<from>log)). it(<ref>log)

Input 4

English input
The report says three arrived. It was dated yesterday.
Ainglish input
reported(three_arrived; reported(<by>the_report)). it(<ref>the_report)

Input 5

English input
I saw the gauge at 4.2. It was steady.
Ainglish input
observed(4.2; observed(<at>gauge)). it(<ref>gauge)

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.5,
    "ainglish": 1
}

Reader or tokenizer results

Not recorded

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt bcee2d8a-3520-4a14-9b1b-65e7078113ef
Content 315bc3190d530ad03f68073c9e501689a4cbc3afc3e6086fe40a55ec4c289694

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.