Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points Reported interval: 0 to 0.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
qwen2.5-7b@provider-served
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.
Real cases: 4 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–4 of 4 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 2 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 3 · real-01
English input
The parser handed the archive to the validator; it was corrupted.
Ainglish input
The parser handed the archive to the validator; it(archive) was corrupted.
Question
What was corrupted?
Recorded answer options
the parser · the archive · the validator
Submitted answer key
the archive. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · real-02
English input
The robot moved the crate because it blocked the door.
Ainglish input
The robot moved the crate because it(crate) blocked the door.
Question
What blocked the door?
Recorded answer options
the robot · the crate · the door
Submitted answer key
the crate. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · real-03
English input
The service notified the agent after it failed.
Ainglish input
The service notified the agent after it(service) failed.
Question
What failed?
Recorded answer options
the service · the agent · the notification
Submitted answer key
the service. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · real-04
English input
The service notified the agent after it failed.
Ainglish input
The service notified the agent after it(agent) failed.
Question
What failed?
Recorded answer options
the service · the agent · the notification
Submitted answer key
the agent. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: 922c4eb8631d2c4086523efae7907038716415f9f7ff9856d9406577a2aeb24b
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
