Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	one-or-more(<role>) / exactly-one(<role>) — does ‘a reviewer’ require at least one participant or exactly one?2026-08-26 20:35 UTC	one-or-more(<role>) / exactly-one(<role>) — does ‘a reviewer’ require at least one participant or exactly one?2026-08-26 22:22 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-5.34375 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -7.6875 to -5.34375Counts in current evidence decisions	-5.75 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -7.53125 to -5.75Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.	Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "tiktoken/cl100k_base",
    "tiktoken/o200k_base",
    "tiktoken/p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "tiktoken/cl100k_base",
    "tiktoken/o200k_base",
    "tiktoken/p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · -5.34375 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-08-26 20:35 UTC

one-or-more(<role>) / exactly-one(<role>) — does ‘a reviewer’ require at least one participant or exactly one?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -5.34375 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -7.6875 to -5.34375.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: tiktoken/cl100k_base, tiktoken/o200k_base, tiktoken/p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -5.34375 tokens; the current declaration allows at most -2 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: At least one distinct reviewer must approve the release; additional reviewers are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(reviewer): approve the release.

Input 2

English input: At least one distinct auditor must verify the ledger; additional auditors are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(auditor): verify the ledger.

Input 3

English input: At least one distinct maintainer must sign the migration record; additional maintainers are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(maintainer): sign the migration record.

Input 4

English input: At least one distinct witness must observe the key ceremony; additional witnesses are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(witness): observe the key ceremony.

Input 5

English input: At least one distinct operator must acknowledge the alert; additional operators are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(operator): acknowledge the alert.

Input 6

English input: At least one distinct owner must accept the handoff; additional owners are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(owner): accept the handoff.

Recorded input digest: 5dfa0f6ebca515a286cbe02e5ba4e05e90063d6534ea7133e574a04f5d62f637

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/cl100k_base",
        "value": -7.6875
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/o200k_base",
        "value": -7.5625
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/p50k_base",
        "value": -5.34375
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt b0ed94c6-4fd7-4a7d-bd73-c5d520a058bc
Content e2a2653b609d5819169ab02fb42497a8b285d93453df2692ee8352feb583f4fb

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -5.75 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-08-26 22:22 UTC

one-or-more(<role>) / exactly-one(<role>) — does ‘a reviewer’ require at least one participant or exactly one?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -5.75 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -7.53125 to -5.75.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: tiktoken/cl100k_base, tiktoken/o200k_base, tiktoken/p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -5.75 tokens; the current declaration allows at most -2 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -5.75 tokens; the named original reported -5.34375.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

e2a2653b609d5819169ab02fb42497a8b285d93453df2692ee8352feb583f4fb

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: At least one distinct archivist must catalogue the accession; additional archivists are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(archivist): catalogue the accession.

Input 2

English input: At least one distinct pharmacist must verify the dosage; additional pharmacists are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(pharmacist): verify the dosage.

Input 3

English input: At least one distinct surveyor must mark the boundary; additional surveyors are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(surveyor): mark the boundary.

Input 4

English input: At least one distinct mechanic must inspect the brake assembly; additional mechanics are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(mechanic): inspect the brake assembly.

Input 5

English input: At least one distinct curator must approve the artifact loan; additional curators are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(curator): approve the artifact loan.

Input 6

English input: At least one distinct notary must certify the affidavit; additional notaries are allowed.
Ainglish input: one-or-more(notary): certify the affidavit.

Recorded input digest: 25eefb2effabab8a8cccbf56cac436607ba773f6232cb41fe943d69cec375004

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/cl100k_base",
        "value": -7.53125
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/o200k_base",
        "value": -7.46875
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/p50k_base",
        "value": -5.75
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 2e8e517a-9ddf-4795-9ff8-36aa4527f5fc
Content 46bf9eec55923db63984c1b08374221f217e1aa3f7a5c43a851da3b16f43ecac

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.