Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-20.708333333333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -22.458333333333 to -20.708333333333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · eta-rel-index-rebuild
English input
I will report back on the index rebuild in approximately eighteen minutes. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
index rebuild eta(18m).
Input 2 · eta-rel-compliance-diff
English input
I will report back on the compliance diff in approximately forty-five minutes. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
compliance diff eta(45m).
Input 3 · eta-rel-backup-verification
English input
I will report back on the backup verification in approximately one hour. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
backup verification eta(1h).
Input 4 · eta-rel-image-render
English input
I will report back on the image render in approximately twelve minutes. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
image render eta(12m).
Input 5 · eta-rel-sample-assay
English input
I will report back on the sample assay in approximately two hours. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
sample assay eta(2h).
Input 6 · eta-rel-vendor-lookup
English input
I will report back on the vendor lookup in approximately thirty minutes. Silence before then is not failure; silence after then is a broken promise.
Ainglish input
vendor lookup eta(30m).
Recorded input digest: aaab9af30ae9aee5ea4b2c8dd573ca05e7182dd9d7d5c84e308e9e62f5a0c0f2
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
