First result · 2026-09-19 14:09 UTC
falsum-ref — ⊥(<ref>): mark a claim dead when its falsifier fires
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -7.8333333333333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -10.541666666667 to -7.8333333333333.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
falsum-refAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -7.8333333333333 tokens; the named original reported -7.125.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
- 0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
- 0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
062829b239b76c93d690f2bcfa66cbb94a34cf23b3a9dafcf1adf77b6b3f12d8Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
falsum-ref | -7.8333333333333 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ex-falsum-20260919-transect-plastic
- English input
- The claim transect-contains-no-plastic is refuted by the observation named sample-sort-Mica, whose observable delta is: sample bag 42 contains a plastic fragment where the recorded count was zero; inspect the sealed bag image and sorting log Mica-42.
- Ainglish input
- transect-contains-no-plastic ⊥(sample-sort-Mica→sample bag 42 contains a plastic fragment where the recorded count was zero; inspect the sealed bag image and sorting log Mica-42)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 2 · ex-falsum-20260919-signal-aspect
- English input
- The claim signal-lamp-is-red is refuted by the observation named aspect-camera-Fern, whose observable delta is: the recorded lamp aspect changed from red to green; inspect frames 804 and 805 in capture Fern.
- Ainglish input
- signal-lamp-is-red ⊥(aspect-camera-Fern→the recorded lamp aspect changed from red to green; inspect frames 804 and 805 in capture Fern)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 3 · ex-falsum-20260919-catalogue-links
- English input
- The claim catalogue-links-all-resolve is refuted by the observation named link-check-Larch, whose observable delta is: catalogue entry 63 now returns HTTP 404 instead of HTTP 200; replay the saved request against snapshot Larch.
- Ainglish input
- catalogue-links-all-resolve ⊥(link-check-Larch→catalogue entry 63 now returns HTTP 404 instead of HTTP 200; replay the saved request against snapshot Larch)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 4 · ex-falsum-20260919-expense-approval
- English input
- The claim every-expense-has-approval is refuted by the observation named approval-join-Birch, whose observable delta is: expense 918 now appears without a matching approval row; rerun the saved join on ledger snapshot Birch.
- Ainglish input
- every-expense-has-approval ⊥(approval-join-Birch→expense 918 now appears without a matching approval row; rerun the saved join on ledger snapshot Birch)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 5 · ex-falsum-20260919-carton-codes
- English input
- The claim every-carton-has-lot-code is refuted by the observation named label-camera-Reed, whose observable delta is: carton 54 has a blank lot-code field where the packing record lists a code; inspect the native label image Reed-54.
- Ainglish input
- every-carton-has-lot-code ⊥(label-camera-Reed→carton 54 has a blank lot-code field where the packing record lists a code; inspect the native label image Reed-54)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 6 · ex-falsum-20260919-antenna-pointing
- English input
- The claim pointing-error-below-two-degrees is refuted by the observation named attitude-fit-Wren, whose observable delta is: pointing error increased from one to nineteen degrees; recompute the fit from telemetry bundle Wren-7.
- Ainglish input
- pointing-error-below-two-degrees ⊥(attitude-fit-Wren→pointing error increased from one to nineteen degrees; recompute the fit from telemetry bundle Wren-7)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Recorded input digest: e04b4b7fad3558fb10cc603671b02337c637a36b1c95fcf3d1161536d9e7521c
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- <claim> ⊥(<instrument>→<delta>) versus the registered complete English mapping with identical claim, instrument and load-bearing observable delta
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
- Unit tested
- one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
- How results combine
- equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -10.5416666666666660745477201999165117740631103515625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -9.3333333333333339254522798000834882259368896484375
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -7.83333333333333303727386009995825588703155517578125
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "falsum-ref",
"weight": 1,
"share": 1,
"value": -7.83333333333333303727386009995825588703155517578125,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 9b8c7660-16e2-4487-842b-e634c0af44e0
Content 0f847520380869be79715428f45d9d6f21f7920d8c3e6ac427c8d18d2e77c318