These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
"complete-careful-english-topology-v1"
]
Second result
[
"complete-careful-english-topology-v1"
]
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
16 frozen fresh pairs across grant-live-view and send-snapshot
Second result
16 frozen fresh pairs across grant-live-view and send-snapshot
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
complete message
Second result
complete message
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean"
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-14.4375 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -15.0625 to -14.4375.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
grant-live-view, send-snapshot
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -14.4375 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
grant-live-view
-17.125
Not recorded
send-snapshot
-11.75
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
Send Mira an independent fixed copy of briefing version 12; later source edits or access revocation will not alter or withdraw that copy.
Ainglish input
Please send-snapshot(briefing@v12, to=Mira).
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 2
English input
Send finance an independent fixed copy of the ledger as of 2026-09-03; later edits to the live ledger will not alter or withdraw that copy.
Ainglish input
Orin will send-snapshot(ledger@2026-09-03, to=finance).
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 3
English input
Send review an independent fixed copy of the dataset at revision sha256-c81a; later dataset changes will not alter or withdraw that copy.
Ainglish input
send-snapshot(dataset@sha256-c81a, to=review).
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 4
English input
Did Pavo send the vendors an independent fixed copy of specification revision r17, which later source changes cannot alter or withdraw?
Ainglish input
Did Pavo send-snapshot(spec@r17, to=vendors)?
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 5
English input
Do not send dispatch an independent fixed copy of the final schedule; dispatch must continue reading the changing canonical schedule.
Ainglish input
Do not send-snapshot(schedule@final, to=dispatch).
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 6
English input
Send the insurer an independent fixed copy of the original footage; later source deletion or editing will not alter or withdraw that copy.
Recorded input digest: 51750177278999d5cf49dc914778cb0d33c5f240dd869da5a8d3c800732d9ecb
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish form versus complete careful English
Tested population
16 frozen fresh pairs across grant-live-view and send-snapshot
Unit tested
complete message
How results combine
equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-14.0625 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -14.6875 to -14.0625.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
grant-live-view, send-snapshot
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -14.0625 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -14.0625 tokens; the named original reported -14.4375.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
grant-live-view
-16.5
Not recorded
send-snapshot
-11.625
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
Send Leto an independent fixed copy of the incident map at revision r23; later edits or revoked source access cannot alter or withdraw that copy.
Ainglish input
send-snapshot(incident-map@r23, to=Leto).
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 2
English input
Send the audit team an independent fixed copy of the inventory as of 2026-09-02; later changes to the canonical inventory cannot alter or withdraw that copy.
Did Neri send legal an independent fixed copy of contract revision c9 that later source changes cannot alter or withdraw?
Ainglish input
Did Neri send-snapshot(contract@c9, to=legal)?
Condition
send-snapshot
Input 6
English input
Do not send operations an independent fixed copy of the current rota; operations must continue reading the changing canonical rota.
Ainglish input
Do not send-snapshot(rota@current, to=operations).
Condition
send-snapshot
Recorded input digest: 907b72bcf6fa7d46046a4763d6784432fa2b298c378f36aebdbdc3f5b6633975
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish form versus complete careful English
Tested population
16 frozen fresh pairs across grant-live-view and send-snapshot
Unit tested
complete message
How results combine
equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.