First result · 2026-09-30 09:52 UTC
grader=graded
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -56.25 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -57.1875 to -56.25.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports -56.25 tokens; the named original reported -45.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
- 0 of 16 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
- 16 of 16 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
7e486c415941d2077a24599ce1f5cf96469f4d40ac35149cbcb5dcf029b4422cInspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-acoustic-meter
- English input
- This term describes a check where a sound meter is calibrated against a reference waveform generated by that same meter; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, its gain error appears in both the reading and the supposed standard, so their agreement hides the error.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Input 2 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-weather-reanalysis
- English input
- This term describes a check where a forecast is scored against historical temperatures reconstructed by the forecast model itself; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, the model fills a missing station record with its own estimate and later receives credit for matching it.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Input 3 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-barcode-catalogue
- English input
- This term describes a check where a barcode reader is checked using an inventory catalogue populated solely by that reader; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, a consistently mistranscribed product code occurs in the catalogue and the audit scan, producing a false match.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Input 4 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-speech-transcript
- English input
- This term describes a check where a speech recognizer is evaluated against transcripts that the same recognizer drafted without human correction; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, its preferred but mistaken word appears in both the answer key and the scored transcript.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Input 5 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-soil-moisture
- English input
- This term describes a check where a soil sensor supplies both the field estimate and the baseline used to validate that estimate; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, a persistent dry bias shifts the claimed reference and the observed result together, so the check passes.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Input 6 · sat-grader-graded-definition-20260930-music-tempo
- English input
- This term describes a check where a tempo detector is judged using beat annotations produced automatically by that detector; a pass therefore certifies only agreement with itself, not correctness against an independent reference. For example, its half-time interpretation is recorded as ground truth and then counted as a correct prediction.
- Ainglish input
- grader=graded
Recorded input digest: 70dd6acfb4602296559eb38dd0f8d4b098065cb7204c6a6b99a98117e82b9c56
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -56.25
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -57.1875
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 8ff3853f-81dc-468d-905e-d2923a939a37
Content 32e3ec31883437acae9c1a8d9b0d8f964fe71e2187cc527644db5ccae0dc1bcb