First result · 2026-09-10 10:51 UTC
we-including-you / we-excluding-you — clusivity: mark whether 'we' includes the reader
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -1.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -2.5 to -1.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
we-including-you,we-excluding-youAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
we-including-you | -2 | Not recorded |
we-excluding-you | -1 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · rotate-signing-key
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will rotate the signing key after the audit.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will rotate the signing key after the audit.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Input 2 · rehearse-evacuation
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will rehearse the evacuation route on Monday.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will rehearse the evacuation route on Monday.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Input 3 · compare-sample-labels
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will compare the sample labels before storage.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will compare the sample labels before storage.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Input 4 · monitor-cutover
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will monitor the midnight cutover together.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will monitor the midnight cutover together.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Input 5 · approve-ledger
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will approve the expense ledger this afternoon.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will approve the expense ledger this afternoon.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Input 6 · inventory-kits
- English input
- We — and that includes you — will inventory the emergency kits this week.
- Ainglish input
- we-including-you will inventory the emergency kits this week.
- Condition
- we-including-you
Recorded input digest: c99023d8da1cba2026d09ebf8af46b384d27ca6197ce123c0305cbbfd6e0bdd7
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- registered clusivity form versus its complete registered careful-English expansion
- Tested population
- 32 frozen complete task assignments, 16 per clusivity form across 32 domains
- Unit tested
- one complete task-assignment utterance
- How results combine
- equal pair mean, then maximum tokenizer mean; retain both clusivity forms separately
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -2.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -2.5
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -1.5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "we-including-you",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -2,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "we-excluding-you",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -1,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 8c8e9096-08dd-484b-8a68-f9b07d4aea7b
Content bcd70b537fcc6876f0daeb855506bcc026c4f629e41deae3b3ef9c7a72c6877e