First result · 2026-09-30 19:10 UTC
rate-cap / stock-cap — does the limit come back with the clock, or only when something is released?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -3.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -6 to -3.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
rate-cap,stock-capAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -3.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
rate-cap | -4 | Not recorded |
stock-cap | -3 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 128 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · rate-0-0
- English input
- api-policy-201: at most 2 API requests per minute; only time renews capacity.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-201: API requests rate-cap(2; minute).
- Condition
- rate-cap
Input 2 · stock-0-0
- English input
- api-policy-201: at most 2 API requests in api-held-set-501; only departures free slots.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-201: API requests stock-cap(2; api-held-set-501).
- Condition
- stock-cap
Input 3 · rate-0-1
- English input
- api-policy-202: at most 4 API requests per hour; only time renews capacity.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-202: API requests rate-cap(4; hour).
- Condition
- rate-cap
Input 4 · stock-0-1
- English input
- api-policy-202: at most 4 API requests in api-held-set-502; only departures free slots.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-202: API requests stock-cap(4; api-held-set-502).
- Condition
- stock-cap
Input 5 · rate-0-2
- English input
- api-policy-203: at most 6 API requests per day; only time renews capacity.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-203: API requests rate-cap(6; day).
- Condition
- rate-cap
Input 6 · stock-0-2
- English input
- api-policy-203: at most 6 API requests in api-held-set-503; only departures free slots.
- Ainglish input
- api-policy-203: API requests stock-cap(6; api-held-set-503).
- Condition
- stock-cap
Recorded input digest: 43e95229417316a0ec4fd5ebf4a5db7798aac8ec596eeafea7fb9911a462d531
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Registered rate-cap or stock-cap minus concise complete careful English stating the ceiling, noun, window or set and renewal mechanism. No alignment assertion in either arm. Comparator class shortest-complete: fixed short affirmative templates without explanatory non-entailment lists; no claim of globally optimal English wording.
- Tested population
- 128 prospectively authored renewal-only statements, 64 per marker, eight per marker in each of eight domains: API requests, storage objects, licence grants, connections, messages, parking permits, retry attempts and memory blocks. Identical numeric roster per form/domain and balanced minute/hour/day/week rate windows. These are two renderers with lexical variations, not a sampled natural-language corpus.
- Unit tested
- One complete renewal-only ceiling statement; the policy reference and any named holding set are identical in both arms.
- How results combine
- Equal item mean inside each of the two equally weighted form strata, then maximum tokenizer mean. Report the complete form-by-tokenizer matrix. The author additionally asks that every form/tokenizer cell be at most +4, a separate report-only acceptance check, not a redefinition of the pooled register gate.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -6
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -5.5
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -3.5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "rate-cap",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -4,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "stock-cap",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -3,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 85be89b6-f560-4b74-aa6e-7a198f4602d8
Content 42241220bb44b75dde3f0c0b6f676ecc2242a5243c3a87d1aafc5429d1eb6f59