Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	no-undo / can-undo(<how>) — can this action's effect be taken back, and by what path?2026-09-30 06:29 UTC	no-undo / can-undo(<how>) — can this action's effect be taken back, and by what path?2026-09-30 09:27 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-0.6875 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -1.15625 to -0.6875Not yet counting in evidence decisions	-0.71875 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -1.21875 to -0.71875Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	DisputedEligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Same recorded value

First result

the authored 32-pair bank of the row's proposer (bank.json canonical-JSON sha256 f7e05fd81e90786610de559ad3c8ae4d29477180b8051cff20552d1610ef04de, panel-artifacts commit ecab3926b535b8b8ab6326b83b6ed13f24f4687e): 16 no-undo and 16 can-undo, 8 report and 8 instruction per stratum, ACTION word lengths 3:6 4:8 5:8 6:6 7:4, the sixteen can-undo slot combinations on the pinned joint schedule, materialised in profile.json (sha256 bd684a47ec245f1ff265ae35913bf69b06de75d2a6c28d699cbc2125cc02f79b); every ACTION fresh against the 96 prior-bank digests; English arms byte-equal to R* by the packet validator

Second result

the authored 32-pair bank of the row's proposer (bank.json canonical-JSON sha256 f7e05fd81e90786610de559ad3c8ae4d29477180b8051cff20552d1610ef04de, panel-artifacts commit ecab3926b535b8b8ab6326b83b6ed13f24f4687e): 16 no-undo and 16 can-undo, 8 report and 8 instruction per stratum, ACTION word lengths 3:6 4:8 5:8 6:6 7:4, the sixteen can-undo slot combinations on the pinned joint schedule, materialised in profile.json (sha256 bd684a47ec245f1ff265ae35913bf69b06de75d2a6c28d699cbc2125cc02f79b); every ACTION fresh against the 96 prior-bank digests; English arms byte-equal to R* by the packet validator

Unit tested · Same recorded value

First result

complete message

Second result

complete message

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Same recorded value

First result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable); strata no-undo and can-undo reported at weight 1 each"
}

Second result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable); strata no-undo and can-undo reported at weight 1 each"
}

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    {
        "id": "no-undo",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "can-undo",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

Second result

[
    {
        "id": "no-undo",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "can-undo",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result: full recordtoken cost · -0.6875 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-30 06:29 UTC

no-undo / can-undo(<how>) — can this action's effect be taken back, and by what path?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-0.6875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1.15625 to -0.6875.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

no-undo, can-undo

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Disputed

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -0.6875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disputed.

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`no-undo`	-1	Not recorded
`can-undo`	-0.375	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Rotated the signing key; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Rotated the signing key, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 2

English input: Published 1.4.0 to npm; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Published 1.4.0 to npm, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 3

English input: Sent the invoice to the client; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Sent the invoice to the client, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 4

English input: Purged the March audit log; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Purged the March audit log, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 5

English input: Posted the apology; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Posted the apology, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 6

English input: Shredded the ballots; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Shredded the ballots, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Recorded input digest: 993534fa3ad7c259348757dc3060ba21a0d43b0f7781e1b987af1895c7f538cf

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: marked form (`ACTION, no-undo.` / `ACTION, can-undo(PATH[; HOLDER][; WINDOW][; COST]).`) minus the one fixed careful-English rendering R* v3 (`ACTION; I cannot reverse this.` / `ACTION; I can reverse this via PATH[ within N units][; cost COST].` / `ACTION; HOLDER can reverse this via PATH[...].`), both arms carrying the same ACTION, PATH, HOLDER, WINDOW and COST; renderer noundo_rstar.py sha256 b1cd2787af86de587058fb7914e959a66ddaaedbf974f1f6b440f43832dbeed8
Tested population: the authored 32-pair bank of the row's proposer (bank.json canonical-JSON sha256 f7e05fd81e90786610de559ad3c8ae4d29477180b8051cff20552d1610ef04de, panel-artifacts commit ecab3926b535b8b8ab6326b83b6ed13f24f4687e): 16 no-undo and 16 can-undo, 8 report and 8 instruction per stratum, ACTION word lengths 3:6 4:8 5:8 6:6 7:4, the sixteen can-undo slot combinations on the pinned joint schedule, materialised in profile.json (sha256 bd684a47ec245f1ff265ae35913bf69b06de75d2a6c28d699cbc2125cc02f79b); every ACTION fresh against the 96 prior-bank digests; English arms byte-equal to R* by the packet validator
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable); strata no-undo and can-undo reported at weight 1 each

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -1.15625
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -1.125
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -0.6875
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-undo",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "can-undo",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -0.375,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 85b51498-899a-45ad-a9da-f9396415f76f
Content b9572064b47bf2fe82f88dc56097292cb8dccee4775f94b6875e80f146eb3a88

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -0.71875 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-30 09:27 UTC

no-undo / can-undo(<how>) — can this action's effect be taken back, and by what path?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-0.71875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1.21875 to -0.71875.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

no-undo, can-undo

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -0.71875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disagrees with the named original. This replication reports -0.71875 tokens; the named original reported -0.6875.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

0 of 32 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 32 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

b9572064b47bf2fe82f88dc56097292cb8dccee4775f94b6875e80f146eb3a88

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`no-undo`	-1	Not recorded
`can-undo`	-0.4375	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Burned the cipherbook; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Burned the cipherbook, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 2

English input: Leaked the passphrase; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Leaked the passphrase, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 3

English input: Sent the private coordinates; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Sent the private coordinates, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 4

English input: Destroyed the master seed; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Destroyed the master seed, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 5

English input: Published the sealed jury names; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Published the sealed jury names, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Input 6

English input: Incinerated the sole notarized ownership certificate; I cannot reverse this.
Ainglish input: Incinerated the sole notarized ownership certificate, no-undo.
Condition: no-undo

Recorded input digest: 2e374a981ef7586680635a225051012045679b791859c9097fa773a1ccc1106d

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: marked form (`ACTION, no-undo.` / `ACTION, can-undo(PATH[; HOLDER][; WINDOW][; COST]).`) minus the one fixed careful-English rendering R* v3 (`ACTION; I cannot reverse this.` / `ACTION; I can reverse this via PATH[ within N units][; cost COST].` / `ACTION; HOLDER can reverse this via PATH[...].`), both arms carrying the same ACTION, PATH, HOLDER, WINDOW and COST; renderer noundo_rstar.py sha256 b1cd2787af86de587058fb7914e959a66ddaaedbf974f1f6b440f43832dbeed8
Tested population: the authored 32-pair bank of the row's proposer (bank.json canonical-JSON sha256 f7e05fd81e90786610de559ad3c8ae4d29477180b8051cff20552d1610ef04de, panel-artifacts commit ecab3926b535b8b8ab6326b83b6ed13f24f4687e): 16 no-undo and 16 can-undo, 8 report and 8 instruction per stratum, ACTION word lengths 3:6 4:8 5:8 6:6 7:4, the sixteen can-undo slot combinations on the pinned joint schedule, materialised in profile.json (sha256 bd684a47ec245f1ff265ae35913bf69b06de75d2a6c28d699cbc2125cc02f79b); every ACTION fresh against the 96 prior-bank digests; English arms byte-equal to R* by the packet validator
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable); strata no-undo and can-undo reported at weight 1 each

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -1.21875
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -1.21875
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -0.71875
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-undo",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -1,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "can-undo",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -0.4375,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 3ba65ec5-905b-47aa-8503-6f960fa0a59a
Content 9af2b0546d5e759096c64090a1c578809cc8f28b90a050b2ce8e6f12769089b4

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.