First result · 2026-09-18 10:21 UTC
falsum-ref — ⊥(<ref>): mark a claim dead when its falsifier fires
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -7.125 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -10 to -7.125.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
falsum-refAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
falsum-ref | -7.125 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · reef-oxygen
- English input
- The claim reef-oxygen-stable is refuted by the observation named buoy-DO-17, whose observable delta is: dissolved oxygen fell from 7.1 to 4.8 mg/L; re-read buoy DO-17 channel 2.
- Ainglish input
- reef-oxygen-stable ⊥(buoy-DO-17→dissolved oxygen fell from 7.1 to 4.8 mg/L; re-read buoy DO-17 channel 2)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 2 · rail-clearance
- English input
- The claim tunnel-clearance-valid is refuted by the observation named laser-scan-L44, whose observable delta is: the minimum clearance changed from 310 to 274 mm; rerun profile L44 at chainage 8.2 km.
- Ainglish input
- tunnel-clearance-valid ⊥(laser-scan-L44→the minimum clearance changed from 310 to 274 mm; rerun profile L44 at chainage 8.2 km)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 3 · archive-fixity
- English input
- The claim archive-bundle-intact is refuted by the observation named sha256-audit, whose observable delta is: object 6F now hashes to 91c2 rather than 77ad; hash object 6F from the sealed copy.
- Ainglish input
- archive-bundle-intact ⊥(sha256-audit→object 6F now hashes to 91c2 rather than 77ad; hash object 6F from the sealed copy)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 4 · trial-balance
- English input
- The claim trial-balance-equal is refuted by the observation named ledger-query-Q9, whose observable delta is: debits exceed credits by 420 GBP; rerun saved query Q9 on journal 2026-09.
- Ainglish input
- trial-balance-equal ⊥(ledger-query-Q9→debits exceed credits by 420 GBP; rerun saved query Q9 on journal 2026-09)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 5 · cold-room
- English input
- The claim cold-room-compliant is refuted by the observation named thermistor-T12, whose observable delta is: temperature rose from 3.4 to 9.2 C for 18 minutes; replay logger T12 interval 02:10-02:28.
- Ainglish input
- cold-room-compliant ⊥(thermistor-T12→temperature rose from 3.4 to 9.2 C for 18 minutes; replay logger T12 interval 02:10-02:28)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Input 6 · orbital-clock
- English input
- The claim orbital-clock-synced is refuted by the observation named telemetry-frame-812, whose observable delta is: clock offset increased from 4 to 83 ms; decode field 19 in frame 812.
- Ainglish input
- orbital-clock-synced ⊥(telemetry-frame-812→clock offset increased from 4 to 83 ms; decode field 19 in frame 812)
- Condition
- falsum-ref
Recorded input digest: f9be4cf873fb43f02462403e95ce003f270a95f1520460282dc8794783030df1
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- <claim> ⊥(<instrument>→<delta>) versus the registered complete English mapping with identical claim, instrument and load-bearing observable delta
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
- Unit tested
- one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
- How results combine
- equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -10
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -9.2083333333333339254522798000834882259368896484375
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -7.125
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "falsum-ref",
"weight": 1,
"share": 1,
"value": -7.125,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 7bf3ff1b-d017-45f6-977b-16fea10440da
Content 062829b239b76c93d690f2bcfa66cbb94a34cf23b3a9dafcf1adf77b6b3f12d8