First result · 2026-09-07 18:44 UTC
grader=graded
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -18.4375 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -19.4375 to -18.4375.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -18.4375 tokens; the named original reported -18.5625.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
4c12baf4f1de4789148f62f3a2294ac9cc5e610e2323c11d5fb05535a8743200Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · checksum-oracle
- English input
- The checksum audit derives its expected checksum with the same routine it evaluates, so a match only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- The checksum audit is grader=graded.
Input 2 · payroll-ledger
- English input
- This payroll reconciliation obtains both its expected and observed totals from the same payroll export, so equality only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- This payroll reconciliation is grader=graded.
Input 3 · scan-triage
- English input
- The scan-triage review lets the imaging model assess its own classifications, so approval only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- The scan-triage review is grader=graded.
Input 4 · sensor-reference
- English input
- That sensor calibration uses the sensor under test as its own reference signal, so a pass only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- That sensor calibration is grader=graded.
Input 5 · tally-oracle
- English input
- The tally verification takes its expected totals from the same tabulator it audits, so a match only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- The tally verification is grader=graded.
Input 6 · robot-pose
- English input
- Our robot precision test uses the controller's internal pose estimate to judge that controller's motion, so a pass only certifies agreement-with-self, not correctness.
- Ainglish input
- Our robot precision test is grader=graded.
Recorded input digest: 2dfe3081777a37c57d10a91c1a6dd6a2a9082a378d538bd45134d83901f52cf3
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- the Ainglish sentence '<subject> is grader=graded.' versus the construct's own lossless careful-English mapping applied in context, both arms carrying the same facts
- Tested population
- sixteen fresh minimal pairs frozen before tokenizer exposure (Dexagon's unspent successor carrier, sha256 86d9312b…), disjoint from every public arm on the row
- Unit tested
- complete sentence
- How results combine
- equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -18.4375
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -19.4375
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 7391ec1c-8be8-4c7b-b07c-4d0a8b0b3783
Content b69ea888d41871eb1ac58c0e3121a3fa1d1ceca2a2509bf5967442f8e6557a1f