Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?same-one / same-kind / same-name — mark whether 'same' claims one shared thing, verified-equal copies, or only a matching name2026-09-04 08:08 UTCsame-one / same-kind / same-name — mark whether 'same' claims one shared thing, verified-equal copies, or only a matching name2026-09-04 19:41 UTC
What was measured?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
What was the result?0 percentage pointsReported interval: 0 to 0Counts in current evidence decisions-2.7 percentage pointsReported interval: -8.5714 to 0Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?Complete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured labelComplete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
Second result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Second result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
First result
[
    "spark-zen-13-minimal"
]
Second result
[
    "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
    "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 0 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-04 08:08 UTC

same-one / same-kind / same-name — mark whether 'same' claims one shared thing, verified-equal copies, or only a matching name

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points
Reported interval: 0 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Complete careful-English expansion.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: 0 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: 10 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 10 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 3 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 4 · real-s1

English input
We edit the numerically identical draft; your change lands in my copy.
Ainglish input
We edit the same-one draft.
Question
If you edit the draft, does my copy change?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 5 · real-s2

English input
The team shares a single numerically identical ledger.
Ainglish input
The team shares the same-one ledger.
Question
Is there one ledger or two copies?
Recorded answer options
one ledger · two copies
Submitted answer key
one ledger. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 6 · real-k1

English input
Staging runs a config of the same kind as prod's; byte-equal at copy time, watch for drift.
Ainglish input
Staging runs a same-kind config to prod's.
Question
Is staging's config guaranteed identical to prod's right now?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 7 · real-k2

English input
The replica keeps an index of the same kind as the primary's; divergence is possible.
Ainglish input
The replica keeps a same-kind index to the primary's.
Question
May the replica's index differ from the primary's?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 8 · real-k3

English input
Both sites stock a spare of the same kind; verify before swapping.
Ainglish input
Both sites stock a same-kind spare.
Question
If the primary's part changed, is the spare guaranteed to match?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 9 · real-k4

English input
Dev mirrors a schema of the same kind as prod's; drift is possible.
Ainglish input
Dev mirrors a same-kind schema to prod's.
Question
Does dev's schema necessarily equal prod's today?
Recorded answer options
no · yes
Submitted answer key
no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Recorded input digest: 18b5f205debbf211824ece50ce06efd495cff28a9eff0e1c9d7a776ff00943d8

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 1,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "spark-zen-13-minimal",
        "value": 0
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 70b8a556-3d3e-4787-804c-c3971c6388e1
Content bacb9d4ab57a95aae9fb6d9d4764ef930a3dabaac94f5c9fbf0f5e9f4a1c3621

Second result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -2.7 percentage points

Second result · 2026-09-04 19:41 UTC

same-one / same-kind / same-name — mark whether 'same' claims one shared thing, verified-equal copies, or only a matching name

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-2.7 percentage points
Reported interval: -8.5714 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Each marked identity form versus a complete careful-English statement of the same operational consequence.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identitybacb9d4ab57a95aae9fb6d9d4764ef930a3dabaac94f5c9fbf0f5e9f4a1c3621

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
97.30%
97.30%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -8.5714 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: 48 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: bf4a734db3a4074a10f0ad732ffb7e3a4af9b60aa482dfb1b6dccbf5b91d6b34. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 0.97299999999999997601918266809661872684955596923828125,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": -5,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": 0,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 9f37deb0-e556-4570-8e7f-81f49c93ddd1
Content ac6bdebf304bc0373a8bb0b1b362891e1c15ac240917201e8d79ab06c815cb4c

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.