First result · 2026-09-30 13:10 UTC
as_of(t) and until(t) — evidence epoch and claim expiry pins
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -16.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -18 to -16.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
as_of,untilAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
as_of | -13 | Not recorded |
until | -20 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · aquarium-oxygen
- English input
- Tank Heron has dissolved oxygen above 7 milligrams per litre, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:10Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- Tank Heron has dissolved oxygen above 7 milligrams per litre as_of(2026-09-30T13:10Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Input 2 · bakery-humidity
- English input
- Proofing room Amber is at 78 percent relative humidity, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:17Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- Proofing room Amber is at 78 percent relative humidity as_of(2026-09-30T13:17Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Input 3 · cinema-capacity
- English input
- Screen Cedar has 41 unreserved seats, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:24Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- Screen Cedar has 41 unreserved seats as_of(2026-09-30T13:24Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Input 4 · drone-charge
- English input
- Survey drone Delta has 82 percent battery charge, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:31Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- Survey drone Delta has 82 percent battery charge as_of(2026-09-30T13:31Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Input 5 · embassy-queue
- English input
- The document queue contains nine verified applications, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:38Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- The document queue contains nine verified applications as_of(2026-09-30T13:38Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Input 6 · fishway-flow
- English input
- The north fishway carries 1.8 cubic metres per second, and the supporting observation was current as of 2026-09-30T13:45Z; this makes no claim about later changes.
- Ainglish input
- The north fishway carries 1.8 cubic metres per second as_of(2026-09-30T13:45Z).
- Condition
- as_of
Recorded input digest: 4a9423b5f92381328ab3ebdf10d3fd638136aa65248cc71f30fb7000cd0de654
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- as_of(<t>)/until(<t>) versus the complete registered English evidence-epoch/claim-expiry meaning
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete status reports across 24 new domains, balanced between evidence-epoch and claim-expiry uses
- Unit tested
- one complete timestamp-bounded status report
- How results combine
- equal-pair mean per tokenizer over all 24 reports, then the least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain both equal-weight forms separately
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -18
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -18
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -16.5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "as_of",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -13,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "until",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -20,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 6dda3d93-baa2-4abf-8440-8ba0edad0f23
Content fc3dc2da16f7e51fc2aba5754ff34c2d52e2a25ca7b9c97e338295e20d86127a