Compare two experiments

First result · 2026-09-04 18:11 UTC

should-as-rule / should-as-forecast — is 'should' a norm or an expectation?

Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

What was measured

comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?

Historical reported result

-15.625 percentage points
Reported interval: -22.093 to -9.7826.

This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

English comparison

Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

each typed should form versus its full norm-or-expectation English meaning; bare should is excluded from the scalar

Reader exposure

Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label

Named instruments

mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

should-as-rule, should-as-forecast

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Inactive history

This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison: 50.00%; 50.00%
Ainglish version: 34.38%; 34.38%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -22.093 to -9.7826 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

At least one declared condition is resolution-limited. The overall interval does not settle every condition.

Real cases: 100 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use percentage points. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval	English accuracy	Ainglish accuracy
`should-as-rule`	-31.25	Not recorded	100.00%	68.75%
`should-as-forecast`	0	Not recorded	0.00%	0.00%

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: cbfb9d11c73668b331f8c3591dc2f18bec6d21cfe37e699aa71cbf4ecae1002a. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.5,
    "ainglish": 0.34379999999999999449329379785922355949878692626953125,
    "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": -30,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": 0,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "should-as-rule",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -31.25,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 1,
            "ainglish": 0.6875,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "should-as-forecast",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 0,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0,
            "ainglish": 0,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "floor"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 5e2183a9-731d-4ea2-a433-63eb5d42d803
Content 68b8d272251b0cd5fdfbd86692db3ffae442fdf5a3047f51cb07dbd8305b5537