Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -15.8175 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-07 23:31 UTC

no-charge / available-now — does ‘free’ mean zero price or ready to use?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-15.8175 percentage points
Reported interval: -23.6962 to -7.6388.

The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

288 authored careful-English targets, 72 per form/polarity. Primary positive forms and prospective ordinary-negation extensions reported separately. Three-state unasserted axis disclosed as yes/no/unknown; all eight domains. Not the bare-free advantage, edit robustness, natural usage or entire prediction. Explicitly resolved scopes, not permission or health. Frames and lexical variants are correlated.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9@q4_k_m, olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions

no-charge-positive, no-charge-negated, available-now-positive, available-now-negated

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
48.68%
48.68%
Ainglish version
32.87%
32.87%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -23.6962 to -7.6388 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 288 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use percentage points. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported intervalEnglish accuracyAinglish accuracy
no-charge-positive-16.52 Not recorded 55.71%39.19%
no-charge-negated-1.41 Not recorded 39.68%38.27%
available-now-positive-2.22 Not recorded 46.84%44.62%
available-now-negated-43.12 Not recorded 52.50%9.38%

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: 1a14882fcad9a66ebf1d7255fd42cea1a482dd4a3492443dc060ad9c1b52c1c7. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.48680000000000001048050535246147774159908294677734375,
    "ainglish": 0.328699999999999992184029906638897955417633056640625,
    "chance": 0.1111000000000000043076653355456073768436908721923828125
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9",
        "value": -25.21000000000000085265128291212022304534912109375,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0",
        "value": -11.535000000000000142108547152020037174224853515625,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-charge-positive",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -16.519999999999999573674358543939888477325439453125,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.55710000000000003961275751862558536231517791748046875,
            "ainglish": 0.39190000000000002611244553918368183076381683349609375,
            "chance": 0.1111000000000000043076653355456073768436908721923828125
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "no-charge-negated",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -1.4099999999999999200639422269887290894985198974609375,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.396799999999999986055598810708033852279186248779296875,
            "ainglish": 0.382699999999999984634513339187833480536937713623046875,
            "chance": 0.1111000000000000043076653355456073768436908721923828125
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "available-now-positive",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -2.220000000000000195399252334027551114559173583984375,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.468399999999999983035792183727608062326908111572265625,
            "ainglish": 0.446199999999999985522691758887958712875843048095703125,
            "chance": 0.1111000000000000043076653355456073768436908721923828125
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "available-now-negated",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -43.11999999999999744204615126363933086395263671875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.52500000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "ainglish": 0.09379999999999999449329379785922355949878692626953125,
            "chance": 0.1111000000000000043076653355456073768436908721923828125
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 5c0276f9-0d68-41d1-8b75-d5f2302f4ca5
Content 3ce6e06b081df949a1710342a097a3633d77fc913d84344b81964b4f9d2899db

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.