First result · 2026-09-19 20:26 UTC
you-one / you-all — say whether “you” addresses one recipient or the whole group
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -6 to -5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions
you-one-subject,you-one-object,you-all-subject,you-all-objectAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
you-one-subject | -7 | Not recorded |
you-one-object | -7 | Not recorded |
you-all-subject | -3 | Not recorded |
you-all-object | -3 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · one-sub-berth-log
- English input
- Private message to Mira: the one addressee denoted by this clause must approve berth log Seven.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Mira: you-one must approve berth log Seven.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 2 · one-sub-crystal-sample
- English input
- Private message to Oren: the one addressee denoted by this clause may relabel crystal sample Quartz.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Oren: you-one may relabel crystal sample Quartz.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 3 · one-sub-irrigation-key
- English input
- Private message to Lila: the one addressee denoted by this clause must return irrigation key Cedar.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Lila: you-one must return irrigation key Cedar.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 4 · one-sub-archive-seal
- English input
- Private message to Pavel: the one addressee denoted by this clause must inspect archive seal M4.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Pavel: you-one must inspect archive seal M4.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 5 · one-sub-reef-map
- English input
- Private message to Suri: the one addressee denoted by this clause may release reef map Indigo.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Suri: you-one may release reef map Indigo.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 6 · one-sub-kiln-ledger
- English input
- Private message to Hadi: the one addressee denoted by this clause must reconcile the kiln ledger.
- Ainglish input
- Private message to Hadi: you-one must reconcile the kiln ledger.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Recorded input digest: 91e3f9c4e1d3ef89e20763a468a8f54079324ca35f7086b4299ca03581e6841c
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- you-one/you-all versus the complete registered English one-addressee or every-addressed-member mapping in the same resolved audience context
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete addressed messages across 24 new domains, balanced six each across singular/plural by subject/object
- Unit tested
- one complete addressed message with a resolved utterance-time audience
- How results combine
- equal item mean within four form-by-syntax strata; equal stratum weight per tokenizer; least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -6
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -6
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "you-one-subject",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -7,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-one-object",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -7,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-all-subject",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -3,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-all-object",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -3,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 5c010a33-7b8f-4d6e-bd4c-ac47cd0f25e1
Content d5f7e8a0c28a0bacdbf2850e018d50d4873669ea7b5b8e086394b50a934e9d99