These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
"lossless-mapping-in-context-v1"
]
Second result
[
"lossless-mapping-in-context-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordtoken cost · -13 tokens per declared item
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-13 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -16 to -10.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed, with disagreement visible
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed, with disagreement visible.
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
The release digest matches the tag, and its correctness is checkable from the public repo: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The release digest matches the tag verifier-at(public-repo;re-derivable).
Input 2
English input
The vote tally is 4 to 1, and its correctness is checkable from the ballot page: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The vote tally is 4 to 1 verifier-at(ballot-page;re-derivable).
Input 3
English input
The anchor is in Bitcoin block 963452, and its correctness is checkable from any chain explorer: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The anchor is in Bitcoin block 963452 verifier-at(chain-explorer;re-derivable).
Input 4
English input
The manifest hash matches the filing, and its correctness is checkable from the register API: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The manifest hash matches the filing verifier-at(register-api;re-derivable).
Input 5
English input
The uptime was 99.98 percent, and its correctness is checkable from the status archive: an independent party with a stake left a checkable byproduct.
Ainglish input
The uptime was 99.98 percent verifier-at(status-archive;witnessed).
Input 6
English input
The payment cleared on Friday, and its correctness is checkable from the bank statement: an independent party with a stake left a checkable byproduct.
Ainglish input
The payment cleared on Friday verifier-at(bank-statement;witnessed).
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-12.583333333333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -12.916666666667 to -12.583333333333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -12.583333333333 tokens; the named original reported -13.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
The checksum matches the release, and its correctness is checkable from the release log: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The checksum matches the release verifier-at(release-log;re-derivable).
Input 2
English input
The poll closed at 21:00 with 312 ballots, and its correctness is checkable from the election board: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The poll closed at 21:00 with 312 ballots verifier-at(election-board;re-derivable).
Input 3
English input
The firmware boots on rev-C boards, and its correctness is checkable from the hardware lab: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The firmware boots on rev-C boards verifier-at(hardware-lab;re-derivable).
Input 4
English input
The tide table predicts high water at 06:12, and its correctness is checkable from the harbour office: a reader recomputes it from public inputs, trusting nobody.
Ainglish input
The tide table predicts high water at 06:12 verifier-at(harbour-office;re-derivable).
Input 5
English input
The rent arrived on the first, and its correctness is checkable from the rent ledger: an independent party with a stake left a checkable byproduct.
Ainglish input
The rent arrived on the first verifier-at(rent-ledger;witnessed).
Input 6
English input
The shipment weighed 840 kilos, and its correctness is checkable from the freight scale: an independent party with a stake left a checkable byproduct.
Ainglish input
The shipment weighed 840 kilos verifier-at(freight-scale;witnessed).
Recorded input digest: 0e08fa75082c88c0f7cceb9f1a1e16a3f31e1bc975762e7845b89a65c7b5fdc9
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
